"집합론"의 두 판 사이의 차이

수학노트
둘러보기로 가기 검색하러 가기
1번째 줄: 1번째 줄:
 +
* Meyries, Martin. “Infinity - A Simple, but Not Too Simple Introduction.” arXiv:1506.06319 [math], June 21, 2015. http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.06319.
 
* Dauben, Joseph W. ‘The Trigonometric Background to Georg Cantor’s Theory of Sets’. Archive for History of Exact Sciences 7, no. 3 (1 January 1971): 181–216. doi:10.1007/BF00357216.
 
* Dauben, Joseph W. ‘The Trigonometric Background to Georg Cantor’s Theory of Sets’. Archive for History of Exact Sciences 7, no. 3 (1 January 1971): 181–216. doi:10.1007/BF00357216.
 
* Doyle, Peter G., and Cecil Qiu. ‘Division by Four’. arXiv:1504.01402 [math], 6 April 2015. http://arxiv.org/abs/1504.01402.
 
* Doyle, Peter G., and Cecil Qiu. ‘Division by Four’. arXiv:1504.01402 [math], 6 April 2015. http://arxiv.org/abs/1504.01402.

2015년 7월 11일 (토) 06:31 판

  • Meyries, Martin. “Infinity - A Simple, but Not Too Simple Introduction.” arXiv:1506.06319 [math], June 21, 2015. http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.06319.
  • Dauben, Joseph W. ‘The Trigonometric Background to Georg Cantor’s Theory of Sets’. Archive for History of Exact Sciences 7, no. 3 (1 January 1971): 181–216. doi:10.1007/BF00357216.
  • Doyle, Peter G., and Cecil Qiu. ‘Division by Four’. arXiv:1504.01402 [math], 6 April 2015. http://arxiv.org/abs/1504.01402.