"고전논리학"의 두 판 사이의 차이

수학노트
둘러보기로 가기 검색하러 가기
(→‎노트: 새 문단)
 
(→‎메타데이터: 새 문단)
28번째 줄: 28번째 줄:
 
===소스===
 
===소스===
 
  <references />
 
  <references />
 +
 +
== 메타데이터 ==
 +
 +
===위키데이터===
 +
* ID :  [https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q236975 Q236975]

2020년 12월 26일 (토) 05:21 판

노트

위키데이터

말뭉치

  1. In fact, classical logic was the reconciliation of Aristotle's logic, which dominated most of the last 2000 years, with the propositional Stoic logic.[1]
  2. Leibniz's calculus ratiocinator can be seen as foreshadowing classical logic.[1]
  3. Bernard Bolzano has the understanding of existential import found in classical logic and not in Aristotle.[1]
  4. Though he never questioned Aristotle, George Boole's algebraic reformulation of logic, so called Boolean logic, was a predecessor of modern mathematical logic and classical logic.[1]
  5. Though various alternatives and innumerable extensions to classical logic have been proposed, none has yet succeeded in questioning its domination.[2]
  6. Thus, it is no surprise that many attempts to apply formal methods to the law have been centred upon using first-order classical logic.[2]
  7. By “classical logic” one broadly refers to those such systems which reflect the kind of logic as understood, quite literally, by the classics, say starting with Aristotle, Metaphysics 1011b24.[3]
  8. There is some variance in what exactly counts as classical and as non-classical in logic, but one main characteristic of classical logic is its use of the principle of excluded middle.[3]
  9. One consequence of the principle of excluded middle in classical logic is the possibility to obtain proof of a proposition by showing that its negation is false (proof by contradiction).[3]
  10. There are other principles that are often associated with classical logic, which still seemed self-evident at a time, but maybe less so than the principle of excluded middle.[3]
  11. Inferential conception of explanation follows the classical logic argument.[4]
  12. We give an equivalent proof for the classical logic which turns out to have disjoint distributive and nondistributive ortholattices.[5]
  13. In particular, we prove that both classical logic and quantum logic are sound and complete with respect to each of these lattices.[5]
  14. We also show that there is one common nonorthomodular lattice that is a model of both quantum and classical logic.[5]
  15. In classical logic, it has been known as two-valued interpretation for more than a century.[5]
  16. Suffice it to note that the inference ex falso quodlibet is sanctioned in systems of classical logic, the subject of this article.[6]
  17. For this reason, classical logic has often been called “the one right logic”.[6]
  18. That classical logic has been given as the answer to which logic ought to guide reasoning is not unexpected.[6]
  19. As indicated in Section 5, there are certain expressive limitations to classical logic.[6]
  20. us explain why it is fair to say that an image is a copy of classical logic in intuitionistic logic.[7]
  21. The book identifies a number of important current trends in contemporary non-classical logic.[8]
  22. This course explores non-classical logics and extensions to classical logic.[9]

소스

메타데이터

위키데이터