"형식 체계"의 두 판 사이의 차이

수학노트
둘러보기로 가기 검색하러 가기
(→‎노트: 새 문단)
 
(→‎메타데이터: 새 문단)
40번째 줄: 40번째 줄:
 
===소스===
 
===소스===
 
  <references />
 
  <references />
 +
 +
== 메타데이터 ==
 +
 +
===위키데이터===
 +
* ID :  [https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q649732 Q649732]

2020년 12월 26일 (토) 06:03 판

노트

  • Each formal system has a formal language, which is composed by primitive symbols.[1]
  • David Hilbert founded metamathematics as a discipline for discussing formal systems.[1]
  • Any language that one uses to talk about a formal system is called a metalanguage.[1]
  • Once a formal system is given, one can define the set of theorems which can be proved inside the formal system.[1]
  • Our task is to define formal systems that describe systems and reason about those systems to determine correctness.[2]
  • In this class we will focus on defining models in a specific formal system.[2]
  • Therefore, we discuss syntax, semantics, inference and computation in the context of continuous formal systems.[3]
  • A formal system is presented for the differentiation of mathematical formulas which can be implemented on a digital computer.[4]
  • This paper describes development of a formal system for representing behaviour-change theories that aims to improve clarity and consistency.[5]
  • Roughly, a formal system is a system of axioms equipped with rules of inference, which allow one to generate new theorems.[6]
  • Proving them would thus require a formal system that incorporates methods going beyond ZFC.[6]
  • Two theories may have radically different intended subject matter and yet, as formal systems, one may be interpretable in another.[6]
  • Gödel’s proof also requires the notion of representability of sets and relations in a formal system \(F\).[6]
  • During RASTA 2002 there was some discussion about the utility of formal systems for building or understanding multi-agent systems (MAS).[7]
  • I argue that (as with any tool) one has to use formal systems appropriately.[7]
  • In short, the question is not whether to abstract from our field of study using formal systems but how.[7]
  • Presenting a formal system elsewhere implies that it is relevant to the people in the domain in which it is being presented.[7]
  • Proving techniques in the solution of problems designed on formal systems employ logical connectivity.[8]
  • Just this: for a formal system to work at all it must be possible to read and write tokens successfully.[9]
  • Formal systems must have a positive, reliable method of reading and writing.[9]
  • This chapter explains the definition and structure of a formal system.[10]
  • The chapter also examines the structure of a formal system in detail.[10]
  • Certain specializations, and the reduction of formal systems to special forms, have been considered.[11]
  • It introduces the ultimate refinement of the notion—namely, the completely formal system.[11]
  • Read More on This Topic metalogic …expressions) of formal languages and formal systems.[12]
  • Formal Systems play an important role in computer science, linguisitics, and logic.[13]
  • There is some reason to believe that formal systems may be useful in the study of human thought.[13]
  • The symbols by themselves seem to be meaningless, but when put into certain formal systems, they seem to acquire meaning.[13]
  • that defines which strings of symbol are in the language of our formal system.[13]
  • If the set of assumptions is empty, then the last sentence in a formal proof is called a theorem of the formal system.[14]
  • A formal system is used for inferring theorems from axioms according to a set of rules.[15]
  • These rules, which are used for carrying out the inference of theorems from axioms, are the logical calculus of the formal system.[15]
  • A formal language is a language that is defined by a formal system.[15]
  • A structure that satisfies all the axioms of the formal system is known as a model of the logical system.[15]
  • Formal systems have the virtue that absolutely certain proofs—or absolutely certain knowledge—can be found within them, and nowhere else.[16]
  • In mathematics, formal proofs are the product of formal systems, consisting of axioms and rules of deduction.[16]
  • If all of the theorems are true, then the formal system is said to be "sound".[17]

소스

메타데이터

위키데이터