"형식 체계"의 두 판 사이의 차이
둘러보기로 가기
검색하러 가기
Pythagoras0 (토론 | 기여) (→노트: 새 문단) |
Pythagoras0 (토론 | 기여) (→메타데이터: 새 문단) |
||
| 40번째 줄: | 40번째 줄: | ||
===소스=== | ===소스=== | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
| + | |||
| + | == 메타데이터 == | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===위키데이터=== | ||
| + | * ID : [https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q649732 Q649732] | ||
2020년 12월 26일 (토) 06:03 판
노트
- Each formal system has a formal language, which is composed by primitive symbols.[1]
- David Hilbert founded metamathematics as a discipline for discussing formal systems.[1]
- Any language that one uses to talk about a formal system is called a metalanguage.[1]
- Once a formal system is given, one can define the set of theorems which can be proved inside the formal system.[1]
- Our task is to define formal systems that describe systems and reason about those systems to determine correctness.[2]
- In this class we will focus on defining models in a specific formal system.[2]
- Therefore, we discuss syntax, semantics, inference and computation in the context of continuous formal systems.[3]
- A formal system is presented for the differentiation of mathematical formulas which can be implemented on a digital computer.[4]
- This paper describes development of a formal system for representing behaviour-change theories that aims to improve clarity and consistency.[5]
- Roughly, a formal system is a system of axioms equipped with rules of inference, which allow one to generate new theorems.[6]
- Proving them would thus require a formal system that incorporates methods going beyond ZFC.[6]
- Two theories may have radically different intended subject matter and yet, as formal systems, one may be interpretable in another.[6]
- Gödel’s proof also requires the notion of representability of sets and relations in a formal system \(F\).[6]
- During RASTA 2002 there was some discussion about the utility of formal systems for building or understanding multi-agent systems (MAS).[7]
- I argue that (as with any tool) one has to use formal systems appropriately.[7]
- In short, the question is not whether to abstract from our field of study using formal systems but how.[7]
- Presenting a formal system elsewhere implies that it is relevant to the people in the domain in which it is being presented.[7]
- Proving techniques in the solution of problems designed on formal systems employ logical connectivity.[8]
- Just this: for a formal system to work at all it must be possible to read and write tokens successfully.[9]
- Formal systems must have a positive, reliable method of reading and writing.[9]
- This chapter explains the definition and structure of a formal system.[10]
- The chapter also examines the structure of a formal system in detail.[10]
- Certain specializations, and the reduction of formal systems to special forms, have been considered.[11]
- It introduces the ultimate refinement of the notion—namely, the completely formal system.[11]
- Read More on This Topic metalogic …expressions) of formal languages and formal systems.[12]
- Formal Systems play an important role in computer science, linguisitics, and logic.[13]
- There is some reason to believe that formal systems may be useful in the study of human thought.[13]
- The symbols by themselves seem to be meaningless, but when put into certain formal systems, they seem to acquire meaning.[13]
- that defines which strings of symbol are in the language of our formal system.[13]
- If the set of assumptions is empty, then the last sentence in a formal proof is called a theorem of the formal system.[14]
- A formal system is used for inferring theorems from axioms according to a set of rules.[15]
- These rules, which are used for carrying out the inference of theorems from axioms, are the logical calculus of the formal system.[15]
- A formal language is a language that is defined by a formal system.[15]
- A structure that satisfies all the axioms of the formal system is known as a model of the logical system.[15]
- Formal systems have the virtue that absolutely certain proofs—or absolutely certain knowledge—can be found within them, and nowhere else.[16]
- In mathematics, formal proofs are the product of formal systems, consisting of axioms and rules of deduction.[16]
- If all of the theorems are true, then the formal system is said to be "sound".[17]
소스
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Formal systems
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 The University of Kansas
- ↑ Continuous Formal Systems: A Unifying Model in Language and Cognition
- ↑ A Formal System for Differentiation
- ↑ Development of a formal system for representing behaviour-change theories
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorems (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 The Use and Purpose of Formal Systems in MAS
- ↑ ZKIP and Formal System
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 Machines, minds and computers
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 IV Definition and Structure of a Formal System
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 Chapter 1 Formal Systems
- ↑ Formal system | logic
- ↑ 13.0 13.1 13.2 13.3 formalsystems
- ↑ Formal proof
- ↑ 15.0 15.1 15.2 15.3 Formal system
- ↑ 16.0 16.1 New World Encyclopedia
- ↑ FORMAL SYSTEMS: Philosophy of Computer Science
메타데이터
위키데이터
- ID : Q649732