"역설"의 두 판 사이의 차이

수학노트
둘러보기로 가기 검색하러 가기
(→‎메타데이터: 새 문단)
 
57번째 줄: 57번째 줄:
 
  <references />
 
  <references />
  
−
== 메타데이터 ==
+
==메타데이터==
−
 
 
 
===위키데이터===
 
===위키데이터===
 
* ID :  [https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q483372 Q483372]
 
* ID :  [https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q483372 Q483372]
 +
===Spacy 패턴 목록===
 +
* [{'LEMMA': 'paradox'}]
 +
* [{'LEMMA': 'contradiction'}]
 +
* [{'LEMMA': 'antinomy'}]

2021년 2월 17일 (수) 01:26 기준 최신판

노트

위키데이터

말뭉치

  1. For the actors, the goal was a paradox : real emotion, produced on cue.[1]
  2. Again and again, he returns in his writing to the paradox of a woman who is superior to the men around her by virtue of social class though considered inferior to them on account of her gender.[1]
  3. Was it a harmless paradox , intended to puzzle her?[1]
  4. Another example of self-reference is the question of whether the barber shaves himself in the barber paradox.[2]
  5. " Contradiction "This statement is false"; the statement cannot be false and true at the same time.[2]
  6. Another example of contradiction is if a man talking to a genie wishes that wishes couldn't come true.[2]
  7. A paradox that is both true and false at the same time and in the same sense is called a dialetheia.[2]
  8. For each of these three secular philosophical positions, the project of a history of science revealed a basic paradox.[3]
  9. Although also noticed by Ernst Zermelo, the contradiction was not thought to be important until it was discovered independently by Bertrand Russell in the spring of 1901.[4]
  10. Russell’s paradox is the most famous of the logical or set-theoretical paradoxes.[4]
  11. Also known as the Russell-Zermelo paradox, the paradox arises within naïve set theory by considering the set of all sets that are not members of themselves.[4]
  12. But from the assumption of this axiom, Russell’s contradiction follows.[4]
  13. A paradox is a logical puzzle that seems to contradict itself.[5]
  14. A paradox is a logical puzzler that contradicts itself in a baffling way.[5]
  15. This statement is false" is a classic example, known to logicians as "the liar's paradox.[5]
  16. When Oscar Wilde said, "I can resist anything except temptation," he used a paradox to highlight how easily we give in to tempting things while imagining that we can hold firm and resist them.[5]
  17. A paradox is a statement that contradicts itself, or that must be both true and untrue at the same time.[6]
  18. In literary analysis, “paradox” can sometimes have a looser meaning: a person or situation that contains contradictions.[6]
  19. There’s no logical contradiction, and therefore no logical paradox.[6]
  20. Although this was considered a difficult paradox by the ancient Greeks, most philosophers today believe that it can be escaped because the “infinite number of actions” theory is invalid.[6]
  21. While dating back to ancient philosophy, only recently have organizational scholars started to explore paradox.[7]
  22. Studies of organizational paradox have grown exponentially over twenty years, canvassing varied phenomena, methods, and levels of analysis.[7]
  23. As paradox studies grow, new insights challenge foundational ideas, and raise questions around definitions, overlapping lenses, and varied research and managerial approaches.[7]
  24. The research team suspected that the answer would depend on an employee’s abilities and attitudes, and so they first designed a questionnaire to measure the “paradox mindset”.[8]
  25. Sure enough, the study found that the employee’s paradox mindset had a large influence on their ability to cope with the demands.[8]
  26. These discoveries may be especially important for leaders, with evidence that a manager’s paradox mindset influences the innovation of their whole team.[8]
  27. Paradox Development Studio brings you the sequel to one of the most popular strategy games ever made.[9]
  28. The paradox of thrift, or paradox of savings, is an economic theory that posits that personal savings are a net drag on the economy during a recession.[10]
  29. The paradox of thrift is an economic theory that argues that personal savings can be detrimental to overall economic growth.[10]
  30. The first conceptual description of the paradox of thrift may have been written in Bernard Mandeville’s “The Fable of the Bees” (1714).[10]
  31. Finally, the paradox of thrift ignores the potential for saved income to be lent out by banks.[10]
  32. learners who do well in Paradox will have typically taken at least a couple of college-level classes in mathematics or computer science.[11]
  33. On the other hand, Paradox does not presuppose familiarity with any particular branch of mathematics or computer science.[11]
  34. New light on this fundamental question has recently been shed through a resurgence of interest in the long-standing Wigner’s friend paradox.[12]
  35. The "paradox of the active user" is a paradox because users would save time in the long term by taking some initial time to optimize the system and learn more about it.[13]
  36. By examining public relations through the lens of paradox, we can begin to identify the logical fallacies that have inhibited progress and innovation in public relations practice and theory.[14]
  37. Scholars from other disciplines can also use this exploration of paradox in PR as a learning tool for identifying logical fallacies and inconsistencies.[14]
  38. The study of paradox in strategy and organization studies has grown rapidly over the last 25 years.[15]
  39. Paradox, as contradictory yet interrelated opposites that exist simultaneously and persist over time, can be qualified as a successful area of study.[15]
  40. How can we as paradox scholars avoid depleting this construct of its vibrancy, complexity, and breadth (Farjoun, 2017)?[15]
  41. Applying the same logic, scholars could examine the emergence of paradox in complex, intricate institutional ecologies that embrace complexity (Tsoukas, 2005).[15]
  42. Founded with the aim of stimulating the development of documentary photography, Paradox has initiated more than 60 unique productions that have travelled to some 120 venues worldwide.[16]
  43. Zeno's paradox, illustrated by Achilles' racing a tortoise.[17]
  44. What then has become of the empirical paradox that Lucas identified?[18]
  45. Remarkably, this paradox has, if anything, intensified over time.[18]
  46. Examining the paradox Perhaps the Lucas paradox isn't such a paradox if one digs deeper.[18]
  47. The paradox of international capital flows is worse than Lucas had imagined![18]
  48. Abstract This paper describes a paradox of global thrift.[19]
  49. This paper proposes a new paradox: the paradox of toil.[20]
  50. The paradox of toil is tightly connected to the Keynesian idea of the paradox of thrift.[20]

소스

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Definition of Paradox by Merriam-Webster
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Wikipedia
  3. ↑ meaning in the Cambridge English Dictionary
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Russell’s Paradox (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 paradox - Dictionary Definition
  6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 Paradox: Definition and Examples
  7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 Introduction
  8. ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 Why the ‘paradox mindset’ is the key to success
  9. ↑ Steam Publisher: Paradox Interactive
  10. ↑ 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 Paradox of Thrift
  11. ↑ 11.0 11.1 Paradox and Infinity
  12. ↑ A strong no-go theorem on the Wigner’s friend paradox
  13. ↑ Paradox of the Active User
  14. ↑ 14.0 14.1 Paradox in Public Relations A Contrarian Critique of Theory and Practice
  15. ↑ 15.0 15.1 15.2 15.3 Paradox theory and the paradox of success
  16. ↑ Paradox
  17. ↑ 8 Philosophical Puzzles and Paradoxes
  18. ↑ 18.0 18.1 18.2 18.3 Finance & Development, March 2007
  19. ↑ The Paradox of Global Thrift
  20. ↑ 20.0 20.1 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK of NEW YORK

메타데이터

위키데이터

Spacy 패턴 목록

  • [{'LEMMA': 'paradox'}]
  • [{'LEMMA': 'contradiction'}]
  • [{'LEMMA': 'antinomy'}]
원본 주소 "https://wiki.mathnt.net/index.php?title=역설&oldid=51392"