"증명 이론"의 두 판 사이의 차이

수학노트
둘러보기로 가기 검색하러 가기
(→‎노트: 새 문단)
 
(→‎메타데이터: 새 문단)
44번째 줄: 44번째 줄:
 
===소스===
 
===소스===
 
  <references />
 
  <references />
 +
 +
== 메타데이터 ==
 +
 +
===위키데이터===
 +
* ID :  [https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q852732 Q852732]

2020년 12월 26일 (토) 05:17 판

노트

위키데이터

말뭉치

  1. Some of the major areas of proof theory include structural proof theory, ordinal analysis, provability logic, reverse mathematics, proof mining, automated theorem proving, and proof complexity.[1]
  2. In parallel to the rise and fall of Hilbert's program, the foundations of structural proof theory were being founded.[1]
  3. Structural proof theory is the subdiscipline of proof theory that studies the specifics of proof calculi.[1]
  4. The book is divided into two parts: Proof Theory in Part I and Algebra in Logic in Part II.[2]
  5. Proof theory has turned into a fascinating area of research at the intersection of philosophy, mathematics and, increasingly, computer science.[3]
  6. Sieg's papers in proof theory fall into three groups.[3]
  7. Proof theory, also called metamathematics, is the study of mathematics and mathematical reasoning (Hofstadter 1989) in a general and abstract sense itself.[4]
  8. Proof theory can be described as the study of the general structure of mathematical proofs, and of arguments with demonstrative force as encountered in logic.[5]
  9. Von Neumann was the key character in the reception of Gödel's results: He interrupted his lectures on Hilbert's proof theory in Berlin in the fall of 1930 to explain the new discoveries.[5]
  10. The first observation is that actual proofs are not based on axioms expressed in a logical language, as in Hilbert's axiomatic proof theory.[5]
  11. The work marked the beginning of ordinal proof theory.[5]
  12. Bernays concludes the outline by suggesting, “This would be followed by the development of proof theory”.[6]
  13. The third part of these lectures is entitled The grounding of the consistency of arithmetic by Hilbert’s new proof theory.[6]
  14. As this is a tool of utmost importance in proof theory, an outline of the underlying ideas will be discussed next.[6]
  15. The two aspects together opened a new era for proof theory and mathematical logic with the goal of proving the consistency of analysis.[6]
  16. Proof theory comprises standard methods of formalization of the content of mathematical theories.[7]
  17. Proof theory makes extensive use of algebraic methods in the form of model theory.[7]
  18. In terms of constructions of model theory it is possible to give simple criteria for many concepts of interest to proof theory.[7]
  19. What are, or should be the aims of proof theory?[8]
  20. I would agree with him that people no longer look to proof theory for epistemological security (like Hilbert).[8]
  21. Are there any neglected directions in proof theory?[8]
  22. In what ways can or should proof theory relate to other parts of logic/foundations/mathematics/computer science/linguistics/etc.?[8]
  23. This chapter presents an exposition of certain themes in proof theory.[9]
  24. In this paper it is suggested to generalize our understanding of general (structural) proof theory and to consider it as a general theory of two kinds of derivations, namely proofs and dual proofs.[10]
  25. Gentzen was able to prove in terms of sequent calculi some of the most basic results of proof theory.[11]
  26. Gentzen and other logicians also used proof theory to study Hilbert’s original question of the possibility of proofs of the consistency of logical and mathematical systems.[11]
  27. Addressing this deficiency, Proof Theory: Sequent Calculi and Related Formalisms presents a comprehensive treatment of sequent calculi, including a wide range of variations.[12]
  28. Present the duality between model theory and proof theory in a philosophically illuminating and clear fashion.[13]
  29. How Proof Theory, Rules and Meaning hangs together.[13]
  30. Tools: in which core concepts from proof theory are introduced.[13]
  31. This volume contains articles covering a broad spectrum of proof theory, with an emphasis on its mathematical aspects.[14]
  32. In the last two decades proof theory has become increasingly important for computer science, and proof theory and theoretical computer science are nowadays considered as being very closely related.[15]
  33. The Proof Theory Virtual Seminar presents talks by leading researchers from all areas of proof theory.[16]
  34. The workshop aims at bringing together researchers in proof theory and rewriting to facilitate the exchange of ideas between these tightly connected fields.[17]
  35. I will relate the results of my investigations into the proof theory of the unfolding of ID1, the schematic system of one arithmetical inductive definition.[17]
  36. The present volume collects papers by the speakers of the colloquium and workshop; and they produce a documentation of the state of the art of contemporary proof theory.[18]
  37. Five years ago I had the pleasure of reviewing Menzler-Trott’s biographical study of Gerhard Gentzen, the main player on the scene in the early days of proof theory.[19]
  38. The development of proof theory enabled the mathematical community to introduce their own work, (informal) mathematical proofs, to thorough meta-mathematical treatment.[20]

소스

메타데이터

위키데이터