"Lectures on dilogarithm function"의 두 판 사이의 차이

수학노트
둘러보기로 가기 검색하러 가기
imported>Pythagoras0
imported>Pythagoras0
287번째 줄: 287번째 줄:
 
</math>
 
</math>
 
where <math>\Delta_3'</math> is the triangle with vertices <math>0,1,e^{2\pi i/3}</math> translated so that they lie on the circle with center <math>(0,0)</math>
 
where <math>\Delta_3'</math> is the triangle with vertices <math>0,1,e^{2\pi i/3}</math> translated so that they lie on the circle with center <math>(0,0)</math>
 
==memo==
 
* 다른게 아니라 저랑 강원대 강순이 박사님이랑 최근에 Zagier 교수님 쓰신 dilogarithm 논문에 관심이 생겼는데 quantum dilogarithm을 포함해서 자기에 교수님 논문 내용을 강연해줄 수 있는지 부탁드리고자 편지드려요.
 
* Bloc 그룹도 강의해줄 수 있으면 더 좋지만, 아니면 남 추측 관련해서 공부했던 내용이라도 강의해주면 많은 도움이 될 것 같아요.
 
* 자기에 교수님 dilogarithm 논문을 읽는데, 부끄럽지만 무슨 말인지 전혀 모르겠더라고요.
 
* q가 나오는 부분과 점근식 부분은 그래도 알겠는데, 나머지 부분들은 능력 밖이라 도움 받을 수 있나해서 여쭤본 겁니다.
 
* 그러니까 Bloc 그룹도 이 논문에 나오는 정도 이해할 수 있으면 저는 만족이에요.
 
* quantum dilogarithm 쪽으로 무언가 더 해볼 여지가 있는지 궁금해서 우선 자기에 교수님 논문부터 시작해보려고 했었는데, 시작부터 어렵네요
 
 
 
===Bloch-Suslin===
 
* <math>B(\mathbb{F})\simeq K_3^{\operatorname{ind}}(\mathbb{F})</math> ??
 
* <math>0\to \tilde{\mu_{F}}\to K_3^{\operatorname{ind}}(\mathbb{F}) \to  B(\mathbb{F})\to 0</math> where <math>0\to \mathbb{Z}/\mathbb{Z}_2 \to \tilde{\mu_{F}} \to \mu_{F}\to 0</math> where \mu_{F} is the unit group of F
 
* <math>K_3^{\operatorname{ind}}(\mathbb{F})</math> is a quotient of Milnor K3 by something else
 
 
 
* functional equation of <math>\zeta_K</math> implies
 
:<math>
 
\pi^{-d_m} \lim_{s\to -m}\frac{\zeta_K(-m)}{(s+m)^{d_m}} \sim_{\mathbb{Q}^{\times}}\pi ^{-(m+1)(r_1+2 r_2)} \zeta _K(m+1)\left| d_K\right| {}^{\frac{1}{2}}
 
</math>
 
where  <math>d_1 =d_3=\dots =  r_2</math> or <math>d_2=d_4=\dots =r_1+r_2</math>
 
  
 
==related items==
 
==related items==

2020년 11월 12일 (목) 23:25 판

dilogarithm fuction

  • Define

\[\operatorname{Li}_ 2(z)= \sum_{n=1}^\infty {z^n \over n^2},\, |z|<1\]

  • extend domain

\[\operatorname{Li}_ 2(z) = -\int_0^z{{\log (1-t)}\over t} dt,\, z\in \mathbb C\backslash [1,\infty) \]


functional equations

reflection properties

\[\mbox{Li}_ 2(z)+\mbox{Li}_ 2(1/z)= -\frac{\pi^2}{6}-\frac{1}{2}\log^2(-z)\] \[\mbox{Li}_ 2(z)+\mbox{Li}_ 2(1-z)= \frac{\pi^2}{6}-\log(z)\log(1-z)\]

proof

\[f(z): = \mbox{Li}_ 2(z)+\mbox{Li}_ 2(1/z)+\frac{1}{2}\log^2(-z)\] is constant as \(f'(z)\) is \[ -\frac{\log (1-z)}{z}+\frac{\log \left(1-\frac{1}{z}\right)}{z}+\frac{\log (-z)}{z}=0 \]


When \(z=-1\), \[\mbox{Li}_ 2(z)+\mbox{Li}_ 2(1/z)+\frac{1}{2}\log^2(-z) = 2\mbox{Li}_ 2(-1)\]

When \(z=1\); \[2\mbox{Li}_ 2(1)+\frac{1}{2}\log^2(-1) = 2\mbox{Li}_ 2(-1)\] \[\frac{\pi^2}{3}-\frac{1}{2}\pi^2 = 2\mbox{Li}_ 2(-1)\]

five-term relation

\[\mbox{Li}_ 2(x)+\mbox{Li}_ 2(y)+\mbox{Li}_ 2 \left( \frac{1-x}{1-xy} \right)+\mbox{Li}_ 2(1-xy)+\mbox{Li}_ 2 \left( \frac{1-y}{1-xy} \right)=\text{something elementary}\]

Let us state this in terms of the Rogers dilogarithm (no worry about the branches) \[L(x): =\operatorname{Li}_ 2(x)+\frac{1}{2}\log x\log (1-x)=-\frac{1}{2}\int_{0}^{x}\left(\frac{\log(1-y)}{y}+\frac{\log(y)}{1-y}\right)dy,\, x\in (0,1)\]

  • \(0\leq x,y\leq 1\)

\[L(x)+L(1-xy)+L(y)+L\left(\frac{1-y}{1-xy}\right)+L\left(\frac{1-x}{1-xy} \right)=\frac{\pi^2}{2}\]

proof

Show that the partial derivatives of \(F(x,y):=L(x)+L(1-xy)+L(y)+L\left(\frac{1-y}{1-xy}\right)+L\left(\frac{1-x}{1-xy} \right)\) are 0. Note \[ L(h(x))' = -\frac{h'(x) \log (1-h(x))}{2 h(x)}-\frac{h'(x) \log (h(x))}{2 (1-h(x))}. \]

\[ \begin{aligned} F_x = & \frac{1}{2} \left(\frac{\log (x)}{1-x}-\frac{\log (1-x)}{x}\right)+\frac{1}{2} \left(\frac{\log (1-x y)}{x}-\frac{y \log (x y)}{1-x y}\right)+0 \\ & +\frac{(1-y) \log \left(\frac{1-y}{1-x y}\right)+(1-x) y \log \left(\frac{(1-x) y}{1-x y}\right)}{2 (1-x) (1-x y)}-\frac{(1-x) \log \left(\frac{1-x}{1-x y}\right)+x (1-y) \log \left(\frac{x (1-y)}{1-x y}\right)}{2 (1-x) x (1-x y)} \\ & =\frac{1}{2} \log (x)\left(\frac{1}{1-x}+\frac{-y}{1-xy}+\frac{-(1-y)}{(1-x) (1-x y)} \right)+\dots \end{aligned} \] Do the same for \(F_y\).

There is a more systematic way to control the cancellations.

Observe \[\frac{d}{dx}L(h(x))=\frac{1}{2}[\log(h(x))\frac{d}{dx}\log (1-h(x))-\log(1-h(x))\frac{d}{dx}\log h(x)]\]

For \(f,g\in \mathbb{Q}(x,y)\), define (symbolically) \[ f\wedge g : = \log (f) d (\log (g))-\log (g) d (\log (f)) \] where \(df = f_x dx + f_y dy\).

For example, \(L'(x)dx =\frac{1}{2} x\wedge (1-x) \)

Then

  • \(f\wedge g=-f \wedge g\)
  • \((f_1f_2)\wedge g=f_1\wedge g+f_2\wedge g\)

So \[ F_x dx+F_y dy = \frac{1}{2}\left(x\wedge (1-x)+(1-x y)\wedge (x y)+y\wedge (1-y)+\frac{1-y}{1-x y}\wedge \left(\frac{y(1-x)}{1-x y}\right)+\frac{1-x}{1-x y}\wedge \left(\frac{x(1-y)}{1-xy}\right) \right)=0 \]

remark
  • recurrence relation

\[1-x_{i}=x_{i-1}x_{i+1},\, x_0=x,\, x_2=y\]

  • 5-periodic solution

\[x_0=x, x_1=1-xy, x_2=y, x_3=\frac{1-y}{1-xy}, x_4=\frac{1-x}{1-xy}\] 5항 관계식 (5-term relation)3.png

remark
  • we believe(?) all functional equations are coming from the five-term relation


remark

Zagier has \[ \frac{\pi^2}{6}-\log(x)\log(1-x)-\log(y)\log(1-y)+\log (\frac{1-x}{1-xy})\log (\frac{1-y}{1-xy}) \] on the RHS, which is not correct

special values

\(\mbox{Li}_{2}(0)=0\)

\(\mbox{Li}_{2}(1)=\frac{\pi^2}{6}\)

\(\mbox{Li}_{2}(-1)=-\frac{\pi^2}{12}\)

\(\mbox{Li}_{2}(\frac{1}{2})=\frac{\pi^2}{12}-\frac{1}{2}\log^2(2)\)

\(\mbox{Li}_{2}(\frac{3-\sqrt{5}}{2})=\frac{\pi^2}{15}-\log^2(\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2})\)

\(\mbox{Li}_{2}(\frac{-1+\sqrt{5}}{2})=\frac{\pi^2}{10}-\log^2(\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2})\)

\(\mbox{Li}_{2}(\frac{1-\sqrt{5}}{2})=-\frac{\pi^2}{15}+\frac{1}{2}\log^2(\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2})\)

\(\mbox{Li}_{2}(\frac{-1-\sqrt{5}}{2})=-\frac{\pi^2}{10}+\frac{1}{2}\log^2(\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2})\)

Bloch-Wigner dilogarithm

  • \(\operatorname{Li}_2(z)\) jumps by \(2\pi i \log|z|\) as \(z\) crosses the cut
  • consider \(\operatorname{Li}_2(z)+i \log|z|\arg(1-z)\), where \(-\pi <\arg z< \pi\)
  • when it cross the line \((1,\infty)\), it becomes continuous
example

\[ \begin{aligned} \operatorname{Li}_2(2+0.001i) & = 2.46583 + 2.17759 i \\ \operatorname{Li}_2(2-0.001i) & = 2.46583 - 2.17759 i \end{aligned} \] and \[ \begin{aligned} \log |(2+0.001i)| \arg(1-(2+0.001i)) & = 0. - 2.17689 i \\ \log |(2-0.001i)| \arg(1-(2-0.001i)) & = 0. + 2.17689 i \end{aligned} \]


  • define

\[D(z)=\text{Im}(\operatorname{Li}_2(z))+\log|z|\arg(1-z).\]

  • real analytic function on \(\mathbb{C}\) except at 0 and 1, where it is continuous but not differentiable.
  • \(D(\bar{z})=-D(z)\), and vanishes on \(\mathbb{R}\).
  • It satisfies the following functional equations :

\begin{equation}\label{functid1} D(x)+D(1-xy)+D(y)+D(\frac{1-y}{1-xy})+D(\frac{1-x}{1-xy})=0, \end{equation} \begin{equation}\label{functid2} D(x)+D(1-x) =D(x)+D(\frac{1}{x})=0. \end{equation}

Bloch group

  • Let \(\mathbb{F}\) be a field
  • \(\Lambda^2({\mathbb{F}^{\times}})\) the set of all formal linear combinations \(x\wedge y\), \(x,y\in\mathbb{F^{\times}}\) subject to relations
    • \(a\wedge b=-b \wedge a\)
    • \((x_1x_2)\wedge y=x_1\wedge y+x_2\wedge y\)
  • \(\mathbb{Z}[\mathbb{F}^{\times}\backslash\{1\}]\)
    • i.e. abelian group of formal sums \([x_1]+[x_2]+\cdots+[x_n]\), \(x_1,x_2,\cdots,x_n\in \mathbb{F}\backslash\{0,1\}\)
  • \(\partial : \mathbb{Z}[\mathbb{F}^{\times}\backslash\{1\}] \to \Lambda^2({\mathbb{F}^{\times}})\)
    • \([x]\to x\wedge (1-x)\)
  • Let \(\mathcal{A}(\mathbb{F})=\operatorname{ker}\partial\) and \(\mathcal{C}(\mathbb{F})\) subgroup of \(\mathcal{A}(\mathbb{F})=\operatorname{ker}\partial\) generated by

\[[x]+[1-xy]+[y]+[\frac{1-y}{1-xy}]+[\frac{1-x}{1-xy}]\]

  • The Bloch group is defined to be

\[\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{F})=\mathcal{A}(\mathbb{F})/\mathcal{C}(\mathbb{F})\]

  • \([x]+[1-x]\) is in \(\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{F})\)
  • Q. is \([x]+[\frac{1}{x}]\) in \(\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{F})\)?


example

\(F=\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-7})\)

\[ 2[\frac{1+\sqrt{-7}}{2}]+[\frac{-1+\sqrt{-7}}{4}]\in \mathcal{B}(F) \]

values of Dedekind zeta at s=2

Dedekind zeta

  • Let \(F\) be a number field with \([F:\mathbb{Q}]=r_1+2r_2\)
  • \(\zeta _F(s):= \zeta_F (s) = \sum_{I \subseteq \mathcal{O}_F} \frac{1}{(N_{F/\mathbf{Q}} (I))^{s}}\)
  • functional equation

\[\xi_{F}(s)=\left|d_F\right|{}^{s/2} 2^{r_2 (1-s)} \pi ^{\frac{1}{2} \left(-r_1-2 r_2\right) s}\Gamma \left(\frac{s}{2}\right)^{r_1} \Gamma (s)^{r_2}\zeta _F(s)\]\[\xi_{F}(s) = \xi_{F}(1 - s)\]

  • at \(s=-n, n=1,2\cdots\), \(\zeta_F(s)\) has zero of order \(r_2\) or \(r_1+r_2\) if \(n\) is even or odd, respectively

\[ 2^{(m+1) r_2} \pi^{-\frac{1}{2} m \left(-r_1-2 r_2\right)}\zeta_F(-m) \Gamma (-m)^{r_2}\Gamma(-\frac{m}{2} )^{r_1} \left| d_F\right| {}^{-\frac{m}{2}}\\ =2^{-m r_2} \pi ^{\frac{1}{2} (m+1) \left(-r_1-2 r_2\right)} \zeta _F(m+1)\Gamma(\frac{m+1}{2})^{r_1}\Gamma (m+1)^{r_2} \left| d_F\right| {}^{\frac{m+1}{2}} \]

Dirichlet class number formula

  • residue at \(s=1\)

\[ \lim_{s\to 1} (s-1)\zeta_F(s)=\frac{2^{r_1}\cdot(2\pi)^{r_2}\cdot h_F\cdot R_F}{w_F \cdot \sqrt{|d_F|}}\]

  • equivalently, \(\zeta _F(s)\) has zero of order \(r_1+r_2-1\) at \(s=0\)

\[ \lim_{s\to 0}\frac{\zeta_F(s)}{s^{r_1+r_2-1}}=-\frac{h_F R_F}{w_F}\]


algebraic K-theory

  • \(F\) : number field
  • \(K_0(F) = \mathbb{Z}\)
  • \(K_1(F) = F^{\times}\)
  • \(K_2(F) = F^{\times}\otimes F^{\times}/\langle x\otimes (1-x) \rangle\)
  • \(K_0(\mathcal{O}_F) = \mathbb{Z}\oplus Cl_F\)
  • \(K_1(\mathcal{O}_F) = (\mathcal{O}_F)^{\times}\)
  • \(K_2(\mathcal{O}_F)\) : finite group

Borel's regulator

  • Borel constructed a map

\[ K_{2i-1}(F) \to \mathbb{R}^{d_{i}},\, i\geq 2 \] where \(d_i = r_2\), or \(r_1+r_2\) depending on the parity of \(i\)

  • this can be used to show
    • \(\operatorname{rank} K_3 =d_2 = r_2\)
    • \(\operatorname{rank} K_5=d_3 = r_1+r_2\)
    • \(\operatorname{rank} K_7=d_4 = r_2\)
  • the covolume of the image of \(K_m,\, m=2i-1\) under this regulator is a non-zero multiple of

\[\frac{|d_{F}|^{1/2}}{\pi^{md_{i+1}}} \zeta_{F}(m)\]

  • for \(K_3\), \(\frac{|d_{F}|^{1/2}}{\pi^{m(r_1+r_2)}} \zeta_{F}(2)\)
  • this is a generalization of Dirichlet's class number formula
  • the rational number given by the ratio is related to other \(K\)-groups (Lichtenbaum conjecture)

Zagier, Bloch, Suslin

  • The Bloch-Wigner dilogarithm \(D(z)\) can be used to define a map from \(\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{C})\) to \(\mathbb{R}\).
  • For \(\xi=\sum_{i} n_i[x_i] \in \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{C})\), let \(D(\xi)=\sum_{i} n_i D(x_i)\).
  • by the 5-term relation satisfied by \(D\), it is well-defined
  • For an embedding \(\sigma : F\hookrightarrow \mathbb{C}\) and \(\xi \in \mathcal{B}(F)\), we may consider \(D\left(\sigma(\xi)\right)\).
  • If \(D\left(\sigma(\xi)\right)=0\) for all such embeddings \(\sigma\), then \(\xi \in \mathcal{B}(F)\) is a torsion element in \(\mathcal{B}(F)\).
  • Bloch and Suslin connects \(K_3\) with the Bloch group
  • \(D\) is compatible with Borel's regulator

\[ \frac{|d_{F}|^{1/2}}{\pi^{2(r_1 + r_2)}} \zeta_{F}(2) \sim_{\mathbb{Q^{\times}}} \det\left(D(\sigma_i(\xi_j))\right)_{1\leq i,j\leq r_2} \] where \(\xi_i,(i=1,\cdots, r_2)\) is \(\mathbb{Q}\)-basis of \(\mathcal{B}(F)\otimes \mathbb{Q}\) and \(a\sim_{\mathbb{Q^{\times}}} b\) means \(a/b\in\mathbb{Q}\)

example

\(F=\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-7})\)

\[ \zeta_F(2) = \frac{4 \pi ^2}{21 \sqrt{7}} \left(D\left(\frac{-1+\sqrt{-7}}{4} \right)+2 D\left(\frac{1+ \sqrt{-7}}{2} \right)\right) =1.8948414489688\dots \]

\(F=\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-23})\)

\[ \begin{aligned} \zeta_F(2) & = \frac{4 \pi ^2}{69 \sqrt{23}}\left(21D\left(\frac{1}{2} \left(1+\sqrt{-23}\right)\right)+7D\left(2+\sqrt{-23}\right)+D\left(\frac{1}{2} \left(3+\sqrt{-23}\right)\right)+D\left(3+\sqrt{-23}\right)-3D\left(\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{-23}\right)\right)\right) \\ & = 2.3081992895457\dots \end{aligned} \]

hyperbolic 3-manifold

  • \(\mathbb{H}^3\) : upper-half space; \(SL_2(\mathbb{C})\) acts as an isometry group
  • hyperbolic 3-manifold : quotient of \(\mathbb{H}^3\) by discrete isometry group
  • ideal tetrahedron is a tetrahedron whose vertices are in \(\mathbb{C}\cup \{\infty\}\)
  • let \(\tilde{D}(z_0,z_1,z_2,z_3) : = D\left(\frac{\left(z_0-z_2\right) \left(z_1-z_3\right)}{\left(z_1-z_2\right) \left(z_0-z_3\right)}\right)\)
fact

Let \(\Delta\) an ideal tetrahedron with vertices \(z_0,z_1,z_2,z_3\). Then its volume is given by \(\tilde{D}(z_0,z_1,z_2,z_3)\).

fact
  1. A complete oriented hyperbolic 3-manifold with finite volume can be triangulated into ideal tetrahedra \(\Delta_1,\dots, \Delta_{\nu}\).
  2. If we assume that the vertices of each tetrahedon are at \(\infty, 0,1\) and \(z_{i}\), then

\[ [z_1]+\dots + [z_{\nu}]\in \mathcal{B}_{\mathbb{C}} \] and the volume is given by \(\sum D(z_i)\).

five-term relation reinterpreted

  • Pachner move : sum of two tetrahedra = sum of three tetrahedra
  • it implies

\[ D\left(\frac{\left(z_0-z_2\right) \left(z_1-z_3\right)}{\left(z_1-z_2\right) \left(z_0-z_3\right)}\right)-D\left(\frac{\left(z_0-z_2\right) \left(z_1-z_4\right)}{\left(z_1-z_2\right) \left(z_0-z_4\right)}\right)+D\left(\frac{\left(z_0-z_3\right) \left(z_1-z_4\right)}{\left(z_1-z_3\right) \left(z_0-z_4\right)}\right)-D\left(\frac{\left(z_0-z_3\right) \left(z_2-z_4\right)}{\left(z_2-z_3\right) \left(z_0-z_4\right)}\right)+D\left(\frac{\left(z_1-z_3\right) \left(z_2-z_4\right)}{\left(z_2-z_3\right) \left(z_1-z_4\right)}\right)=0 \]

  • if we set \(z_0=\infty,z_1= 0,z_2= 1,z_3= x,z_4 = x y\), we get

\[ D(x)-D(x y)+D(y)+D\left(\frac{1-x y}{y(1-x)}\right)-D\left(\frac{1-x y}{1-x}\right) = 0 \]

example (volume of regular ideal tetrahedron)
  • \(\Delta_4\) : ideal tetrahedron with vertices \(\infty,0,1,e^{2\pi i/3}\)
  • volume form on \(\mathbb{H}^3\) \[\frac{dx\,dy\,dz}{z^3}\]. So the volume of \(\Delta_4\) is

\[ \begin{aligned} \int\int\int_{\Delta_4}\frac{dx\,dy\,dz}{z^3} & = \int\int_{\Delta_3}\int_{h(x,y)}^{\infty}\frac{1}{z^3}\,dz\,dx\,dy \\ & = \int\int_{\Delta_3}\frac{1}{2h(x,y)^2}\,dx\,dy \\ \end{aligned} \]

  • this integral becomes

\[ \int\int_{\Delta_3'}\frac{1}{2(\frac{1}{3}-x^2-y^2)}\,dx\,dy = 1.01494\dots \] where \(\Delta_3'\) is the triangle with vertices \(0,1,e^{2\pi i/3}\) translated so that they lie on the circle with center \((0,0)\)

related items


links