"수학적 귀납법"의 두 판 사이의 차이

수학노트
둘러보기로 가기 검색하러 가기
(→‎노트: 새 문단)
 
(→‎메타데이터: 새 문단)
82번째 줄: 82번째 줄:
 
===소스===
 
===소스===
 
  <references />
 
  <references />
 +
 +
== 메타데이터 ==
 +
 +
===위키데이터===
 +
* ID :  [https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q178377 Q178377]

2020년 12월 26일 (토) 05:21 판

노트

위키데이터

말뭉치

  1. In the Algebra world, mathematical induction is the first one you usually learn because it's just a set list of steps you work through.[1]
  2. I was going to start out by officially stating "The Principle of Mathematical Induction"...[1]
  3. Induction proof is a mathematical method of proving a set of formula or theory or series of natural numbers.[2]
  4. Induction proof is used from the theory of mathematical induction which is similar to the incident of fall of dominoes.[2]
  5. Similarly in induction proof for infinite series of n numbers set where P (n) is the set property, we do not need to prove the property for all natural numbers.[2]
  6. In the second step we need to assume first that the property P (k) is true which is called induction hypothesis.[2]
  7. The following are typical of results that can be proved by induction: 1.[3]
  8. (n + 1)! – 1 for all natural numbers using the principles of mathematical induction.[4]
  9. What is meant by mathematical induction?[4]
  10. Mathematical induction is defined as a method, which is used to establish results for the natural numbers.[4]
  11. Generally, this method is used to prove the statement or theorem is true for all natural numbers Write down the two steps involved in the principles of mathematical induction?[4]
  12. We will verify (3.3) by mathematical induction .[5]
  13. I will tell you how mathematical induction works very soon (and hopefully you can feel like Neo for a second) but let me tell you this first.[6]
  14. When I have learned about a recursive algorithm recently, it reminded me of the time I learned mathematical induction.[6]
  15. what similarities I found between a recursive algorithm and mathematical induction and how they help me to implement the algorithm.[6]
  16. Theory and Applications shows how to find and write proofs via mathematical induction.[7]
  17. He then introduces ordinals and cardinals, transfinite induction, the axiom of choice, Zorn’s lemma, empirical induction, and fallacies and induction.[7]
  18. Mathematical induction is designed to prove statements like this.[8]
  19. First we see that the natural number \(n\) does not start with \(1\) as we require in mathematical induction.[8]
  20. What we did in the last paragraph is called the generalized strong induction.[8]
  21. The word "generalized" means that the induction can start with any number and not just \(1\).[8]
  22. We will argue by induction.[9]
  23. Induction arguments don't always start with the case n = 1.[9]
  24. In that case we can use the slightly more general version of induction below.[9]
  25. Once guessed, most such properties can be verified by induction.[9]
  26. Mathematical Induction is a mathematical proof method that is used to prove a given statement about any well-organized set.[10]
  27. We can compare mathematical induction to falling dominoes.[10]
  28. Well, yes, math is deductive and, in fact, mathematical induction is actually a deductive form of reasoning; if that doesn't make your brain hurt, it should.[11]
  29. I like to think of mathematical induction via an analogy.[11]
  30. The cool thing about induction (we will henceforth drop the formality of “mathematical induction”) is that it allows us to prove infinitely many statements.[11]
  31. Induction also allows us to define infinitely many things at the same time.[11]
  32. In this definitive guide to Mathematical Induction, I start from the beginning: precisely what is Mathematical Induction.[12]
  33. I then work through examples using Strong Induction.[12]
  34. Towards, the end I cover arithmetic and geometric progressions as further examples of using induction.[12]
  35. Have you ever wondered why mathematical induction is a valid proof technique?[12]
  36. In this tutorial we’ll break down a classic induction problem in mathematics, and in the next post we’ll apply the same techniques to a classic computer science problem.[13]
  37. Mathematical Induction Mathematical induction is a common method for proving theorems about the positive integers, or just about any situation where one case depends on previous cases.[14]
  38. A slight variation on the induction hypothesis can be useful: assume that for all integers k < n your conjecture holds.[14]
  39. Mathematical induction is not only useful for proving algebraic identities.[14]
  40. See the second example below for a geometric application of induction.[14]
  41. In these cases it is convenient to use the following equivalent form of the principle of mathematical induction.[15]
  42. In these cases one has to deal with the proof of a number of assertions by compound mathematical induction.[15]
  43. Thus, a great number of ideas defined by compound mathematical induction lead to the need for an application of the axiomatic method in inductive definitions and proofs.[15]
  44. Mathematical induction is a method of mathematical proof typically used to establish that a given statement is true for all natural numbers.[16]
  45. Mathematical induction is a method of mathematical proof typically used to establish that a given statement is true for all natural numbers (non-negative integers ).[16]
  46. This completes the induction step.[16]
  47. If you've done proof by induction before you may have been asked to assume the n-1 case and show the n case, or assume the n case and show the n+1 case.[17]
  48. Now I start with the left side of the equation I want to show and proceed using the induction hypothesis and algebra to reach the right side of the equation.[17]
  49. This is a different kind of proof by induction because it doesn't make sense until n=3.[17]
  50. Pk P(k+1) also satisfy the conditions of the induction hypothesis so we know Pj is between P1 and P(k+1) for any j=3...[17]
  51. Mathematical induction, is a technique for proving results or establishing statements for natural numbers.[18]
  52. In problem solving, mathematical induction is not only a means of proving an existing formula, but also a powerful methodology for finding such formulas in the first place.[19]
  53. Mathematical Induction is a special way of proving things.[20]
  54. Mathematical induction can be used to prove that an identity is valid for all integers \(n\geq1\).[21]
  55. It turns out that we cannot completely prove the principle of mathematical induction with just the usual properties for addition and multiplication.[21]
  56. Although we cannot provide a satisfactory proof of the principle of mathematical induction, we can use it to justify the validity of the mathematical induction.[21]
  57. Therefore, the principle of mathematical induction proves that \(S=\mathbb{N}\).[21]
  58. Let's go back to our example from above, about sums of squares, and use induction to prove the result.[22]
  59. For example, if you're trying to sum a list of numbers and have a guess for the answer, then you may be able to use induction to prove it.[22]
  60. But you can't use induction to find the answer in the first place.[22]
  61. Subscribe today The foregoing is an example of simple induction; an illustration of the many more complex kinds of mathematical induction is the following method of proof by double induction.[23]
  62. Giuseppe Peano included the principle of mathematical induction as one of his five axioms for arithmetic.[23]
  63. is to take it as a special case of transfinite induction.[23]
  64. For example, there is a sense in which simple induction may be regarded as transfinite induction applied to the domain D of positive integers.[23]
  65. And the way I'm going to prove it to you is by induction.[24]
  66. The way you do a proof by induction is first, you prove the base case.[24]
  67. So if we know it is true for 1 in our base case then the second step, this induction step must be true for 2 then.[24]
  68. Now spoken in generalaties let's actually prove this by induction.[24]
  69. A proof by induction consists of two cases.[25]
  70. Mathematical induction in this extended sense is closely related to recursion.[25]
  71. None of these ancient mathematicians, however, explicitly stated the induction hypothesis.[25]
  72. The first explicit formulation of the principle of induction was given by Pascal in his Traité du triangle arithmétique (1665).[25]
  73. Mathematical induction is a technique for proving a statement -- a theorem, or a formula -- that is asserted about every natural number.[26]
  74. This is called the principle of mathematical induction.[26]
  75. To prove a statement by induction, we must prove parts 1) and 2) above.[26]
  76. k" -- is called the induction assumption, or the induction hypothesis.[26]

소스

메타데이터

위키데이터