No free lunch theorem

노트

위키데이터

• ID : Q7045226

말뭉치

1. During your adventures in machine learning, you may have already come across the “No Free Lunch” Theorem.
2. two No Free Lunch (NFL) theorems: one for machine learning and one for search and optimization.
3. Free Lunch Theorems Really mean; How to Improve Search Algorithms, Wolpert discusses the close relationship between search and supervised learning and its implications to the No Free Lunch theorems.
4. He demonstrates that, in the context of the No Free Lunch theorem, supervised learning is closely analogous to search/optimization.
5. Broadly speaking, there are two no free lunch theorems.
6. The no free lunch theorem for search and optimization (Wolpert and Macready 1997) applies to finite spaces and algorithms that do not resample points.
7. The "no free lunch" theorems (Wolpert and Macready) have sparked heated debate in the computational learning community.
8. It is argued why the scenario on which the No Free Lunch Theorem is based does not model real life optimization.
9. The No Free Lunch Theorem (NFLT) is named after the phrase, there ain’t no such thing as a free lunch.
10. Hence, the “No free lunch theorem” does not apply when we don’t follow the assumptions it asks us to make.
11. The above theorem (the proof found in No Free Lunch Theorems for Optimisation) shows a few things.
12. In formal terms, there is no free lunch when the probability distribution on problem instances is such that all problem solvers have identically distributed results.
13. It follows that the original "no free lunch" theorem does not apply to what can be stored in a physical computer; instead the so-called "tightened" no free lunch theorems need to be applied.
14. The “No Free Lunch” theorem states that there is no one model that works best for every problem.
15. I end by briefly discussing the various free lunch theorems that have been derived, and possible directions for future research.
16. Generalized No Free Lunch Theorem for Adversarial Robustness.
17. The first problem is that there are at least two theorems with the name “no free lunch” that I know about.
18. Wolpert also published a “No Free Lunch in Optimization”, but I'm only concerned with the theorem for supervised learning.
19. Now that we revisited both conclusion and assumptions, let’s try to summarize, or maybe rephrase the No Free Lunch theorem by Wolpert.
20. As I mentioned, there’s another “No Free Lunch Theorem”.
21. This is a really common reaction after first encountering the No Free Lunch theorems (NFLs).
22. The No Free Lunch theorems say the same thing.
23. In this paper I contrast White's thesis with the famous no free lunch (NFL) theorem.
24. The “No Free Lunch” theorem states that, averaged over all optimization problems, without re-sampling, all optimization algorithms perform equally well.
25. I recently learnt of the existence of a “no free lunch” (NFL) theorem for supervised learning.
26. This essay is an illustrated proof of the No Free Lunch (NFL) theorem; the NFL theorem has many variants, which all say slightly different things.
27. One lesson from the disconnect between empirical results and the No Free Lunch Theorem is that our search space is often more constrained than we think.