귀류법

노트

말뭉치

1. Beyond that, all I can do is offer some advice about structuring a proof by contradiction.
2. The tricky thing is that it is hard to test statements within a proof by contradiction for plausibility.
3. To avoid this issue, it's often best to try to build up as much of the framework for the proof as possible outside of the actual proof by contradiction.
4. If you make the actual proof by contradiction as short and simple as possible, then it will help you avoid mistakes and help other people check your work.
5. Certain types of proof come up again and again in all areas of mathematics, one of which is proof by contradiction.
6. You may like to try this challenge which involves a slightly different proof by contradiction to prove the same result.
7. This would have been much quicker than going through the whole proof by contradiction.
8. This is a basic rule of logic, and proof by contradiction depends upon it.
9. It is that last condition of truth and falsity that is exploited, powerfully and universally, by proof by contradiction.
10. That alerts the reader that you are using proof by contradiction and will plug away at the proof until it collapses logically.
11. You may well benefit from rereading it several times, but once you do, you should feel more confident in your understanding of proof by contradiction.
12. Another method of proof that is frequently used in mathematics is a proof by contradiction.
13. So if we want to prove a statement \(X\) using a proof by contradiction, we assume that \(\urcorner X\) is true and show that this leads to a contradiction.
14. When we try to prove the conditional statement, “If \(P\) then \(Q\)” using a proof by contradiction, we must assume that \(P \to Q\) is false and show that this leads to a contradiction.
15. To begin a proof by contradiction for this statement, we need to assume the negation of the statement.
16. In a proof by contradiction, it is shown that the denial of the statement being proved results in such a contradiction.
17. This fact is used in proof by contradiction.
18. An existence proof by contradiction assumes that some object doesn't exist, and then proves that this would lead to a contradiction; thus, such an object must exist.
19. Proof by contradiction also depends on the law of the excluded middle, also first formulated by Aristotle.
20. The steps taken for a proof by contradiction (also called indirect proof) are: Assume the opposite of your conclusion.
21. An indirect proof establishes that the opposite conclusion is not consistent with the premise and that, therefore, the original conclusion must be true.
22. Proof by contradiction is used frequently in classical mathematics.
23. The approach of proof by contradiction is simple yet its consequence and result are remarkable.
24. Just a word of advice, use the proof by contradiction if the methods of direct and contrapositive proofs do seem to fail.
25. Having said this, I should note that it is considered bad style to write a proof by contradiction when you can give a direct proof.
26. In those situations, the proof by contradiction often looks awkward.
27. In some cases, proof by contradiction is used as part of a larger proof --- for instance, to eliminate certain possibilities.
28. This is of course the classic proof by contradiction, and one can even give a kind of quasi-proof that it must use contradiction.
29. At first sight, this looks like a direct argument rather than a proof by contradiction: we used the hypothesis that to deduce that has a property that obviously implies irrationality.
30. It’s obvious that a rational number has a terminating continued fraction, because as you work it out the denominators keep decreasing … oops, sorry, that was a proof by contradiction.
31. So perhaps the answer is indeed that if you are trying to prove a negative statement, then you have to use a proof by contradiction.
32. The method of proof by contradiction is to assume that a statement is not true and then to show that that assumption leads to a contradiction.
33. For many students, the method of proof by contradiction is a tremendous gift and a trojan horse, both of which follow from how strong the method is.
34. They are closely related, even interchangeable in some circumstances, though proof by contradiction is more powerful.
35. Proof by contradiction makes some people uneasy—it seems a little like magic, perhaps because throughout the proof we appear to be `proving' false statements.
36. Still, there seems to be no way to avoid proof by contradiction.
37. Are there any clues that might lead you to think that an indirect proof might be a good idea?
38. And that would be your proof by contradiction.
39. Famous results which utilized proof by contradiction include the irrationality of and the infinitude of primes.
40. This technique usually works well on problems where not a lot of information is known, and thus we can create some using proof by contradiction.
41. Proof by contradiction is also known as indirect proof, apagogical argument, proof by assuming the opposite, and reductio ad impossibilem.
42. In an indirect proof of a theorem P → Q, you assume P → Q and ~ Q, and try to show ~ P. You can write this as ((P → Q) ∧ ~ Q) →~ P, and construct a truth table for this compound statement.
43. The key to a proof by contradiction is that you assume the negation of the conclusion and contradict any of your definitions, postulates, theorems, or assumptions.
44. Hypothesis testing can be thought of as being the probabilistic counterpart of proof by contradiction.
45. When we use proof by contradiction, we start by assuming the opposite of A (denoted ~A or not A) as being true, and then we try to reach to a contradiction (a statement that is always false).
46. As in the case of proof by contradiction, just because we may not have a good idea of how to reach a contradiction once we assumed ~A to be true, this does not necessarily mean that ~A is true.
47. In fact, we can go in the other direction, and use the law of the excluded middle to justify proof by contradiction.
48. If all else fails, use a proof by contradiction.
49. Sometimes a proof by contradiction is necessary, but when it isn’t, it can be less informative than a direct proof.
50. To prove the statement “A implies B,” a proof by contradiction assumes that both A and “not B” are true, and then shows that this is impossible.
51. Another commonly given example of proof by contradiction is Cantor’s diagonalization argument showing that the set of real numbers is “bigger” than the set of counting numbers.
52. But by trying a proof by contradiction, we have in some sense a tangible "villain" to fight against.
53. Proof by contradiction is a strong method of proving statements.