"EPR 역설"의 두 판 사이의 차이

수학노트
둘러보기로 가기 검색하러 가기
(→‎노트: 새 문단)
 
 
(같은 사용자의 중간 판 하나는 보이지 않습니다)
25번째 줄: 25번째 줄:
 
===소스===
 
===소스===
 
  <references />
 
  <references />
 +
 +
==메타데이터==
 +
===위키데이터===
 +
* ID :  [https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q214975 Q214975]
 +
===Spacy 패턴 목록===
 +
* [{'LOWER': 'epr'}, {'LEMMA': 'paradox'}]
 +
* [{'LOWER': 'einstein'}, {'OP': '*'}, {'LOWER': 'podolsky'}, {'OP': '*'}, {'LOWER': 'rosen'}, {'LEMMA': 'paradox'}]

2021년 2월 17일 (수) 00:31 기준 최신판

노트

말뭉치

  1. Known today as the “EPR paradox,” the thought experiment was meant to demonstrate the innate conceptual difficulties of quantum theory.[1]
  2. He was merely troubled by the philosophical interpretations of the theory, and argued that, because of the EPR paradox, quantum mechanics could not be considered a complete theory of nature.[1]
  3. The EPR paradox (or the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox) is a thought experiment intended to demonstrate an inherent paradox in the early formulations of quantum theory.[2]
  4. Together with his colleagues Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen, Einstein developed the EPR paradox as a way of showing that the theory was inconsistent with other known laws of physics.[2]
  5. Several years later, the physicist David Bohm modified the EPR paradox example so that things were a bit clearer.[2]
  6. Learn how the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox was put to the test by Nicolas Gisin's...[3]
  7. Physicists from the University of Basel have observed the quantum mechanical Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox in a system of several hundred interacting atoms for the first time.[4]
  8. In the past, experiments have used light or individual atoms to study the EPR paradox, which takes its initials from the scientists who discovered it.[4]
  9. "The results of the measurements in the two regions were so strongly correlated that they allowed us to demonstrate the EPR paradox," says PhD student Matteo Fadel, lead author of the study.[4]
  10. For example, the correlations that are at the heart of the EPR paradox could be used to improve atomic sensors and imaging methods for electromagnetic fields.[4]
  11. For about fifteen years following its publication, the EPR paradox was discussed at the level of a thought experiment whenever the conceptual difficulties of quantum theory became an issue.[5]
  12. “The results of the measurements in the two regions were so strongly correlated that they allowed us to demonstrate the EPR paradox,” says PhD student Matteo Fadel, lead author of the study.[6]
  13. One involved the paradox implied by what he called “spooky action at a distance” between quantum particles (the EPR paradox, named for its authors, Einstein, Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen).[7]
  14. Bohm's variant of the EPR paradox can be expressed mathematically using the quantum mechanical formulation of spin.[8]
  15. An illustration of the EPR paradox thought experiment, which is being performed here using pairs of electron-positron.[9]
  16. Bohr had shown that a closer look at the EPR paradox revealed that there is really no paradox there at all.[9]
  17. We show that recording a single pair of images in each plane is sufficient to safely demonstrate an EPR paradox.[10]
  18. The first practical and workable experiments to test the EPR paradox were suggested by David Bohm (though they were not realized for almost two decades).[11]
  19. The EPR paradox is known as an interpretive problem, as well as a technical discovery in quantum mechanics.[12]
  20. There is no need to refer to Bohrs resolution of the EPR paradox, nor is it necessary to assume any further unusual properties of the quantum physical reality.[13]
  21. Experimental investigations which try to test quantum mechanics in respect to the possibility of introducing local hidden variables can therefore not be justified by the EPR paradox.[13]

소스

메타데이터

위키데이터

Spacy 패턴 목록

  • [{'LOWER': 'epr'}, {'LEMMA': 'paradox'}]
  • [{'LOWER': 'einstein'}, {'OP': '*'}, {'LOWER': 'podolsky'}, {'OP': '*'}, {'LOWER': 'rosen'}, {'LEMMA': 'paradox'}]