스핀 글라스

수학노트
Pythagoras0 (토론 | 기여)님의 2021년 2월 18일 (목) 03:23 판 (→‎노트: 새 문단)
(차이) ← 이전 판 | 최신판 (차이) | 다음 판 → (차이)
둘러보기로 가기 검색하러 가기

노트

말뭉치

  1. A diverse collection of condensed matter systems, such as ferroelectrics (11) and magnetic spin glasses (12), can be described by the TFIM.[1]
  2. Spin glasses are frustrated magnetic systems and a hallmark of their “glassiness” is the presence of a rugged energy landscape with many local minima.[2]
  3. A phenomenological theory of the ordered phase of short-range quantum Ising spin glass is developed in terms of droplet excitations, and presented in detail.[3]
  4. The magnetic disorder of spin glass compared to a ferromagnet is analogous to the positional disorder of glass (left) compared to quartz (right).[4]
  5. The term "glass" comes from an analogy between the magnetic disorder in a spin glass and the positional disorder of a conventional, chemical glass, e.g., a window glass.[4]
  6. It is the time dependence which distinguishes spin glasses from other magnetic systems.[4]
  7. Upon reaching T c , the sample becomes a spin glass and further cooling results in little change in magnetization.[4]
  8. We investigate the performance of continuous-time quantum walks as a tool for finding spin glass ground states, a problem that serves as a useful model for realistic optimization problems.[5]
  9. By performing detailed numerics, we uncover significant ways in which solving spin glass problems differs from applying quantum walks to the search problem.[5]
  10. Importantly, unlike for the search problem, parameters such as the hopping rate of the quantum walk do not need to be set precisely for the spin glass ground state problem.[5]
  11. An algorithm which is essentially a quantum walk on a spin glass, although presented using different terminology, has been analysed by Hastings (2019).[5]
  12. The spin glass, a network of frustrated spins with random bonds, exhibits a low temperature, non-ergodic phase with all spins frozen in a complex metastable state.[6]
  13. The spin glass and MBL phases have qualitative similarities; both are characterized by a breakdown of the ergodic behavior on which the foundations of statistical mechanics rest.[6]
  14. Both models show that the spin glass phase is accompanied by MBL, but that the MBL phase persists beyond the limit of the glass phase into paramagnetic phases.[6]
  15. In this phase the eigenstates are delocalized, the ETH is obeyed, and there is no spin glass order.[6]
  16. The phase transition in spin glasses is an intractable problem, since we must strive many-body system with complicated interactions with change of their signs depending on the distance between spins.[7]
  17. Several thermodynamic quantities are calculated numerically as well as spin self-interaction and spin glass order parameter for spin S=1/2.[8]
  18. Detailed discussion on quantum spin glasses and its application in solving combinatorial optimization problems is required for better understanding of quantum annealing concepts.[9]
  19. Fulfilling this requirement, the book highlights recent development in quantum spin glasses including Nishimori line, replica method and quantum annealing methods along with the essential principles.[9]
  20. Classical spin models from ferromagnetic spin systems to spin glasses 3.[9]
  21. The Ising spin glass model in a transverse field has a zero temperature phase transition driven solely by quantum fluctuations.[10]
  22. At the Conference on “Complex Quantum Systems out of Equilibrium” in Murcia, Spain I presented my latest work with Dmitry Abanin on the relation between MBL and spin glasses.[11]
  23. We show that a third, intermediate, state can emerge in a long-range one-dimensional spin glass under the applica- tion of a transverse field.[11]
  24. At small applied fields and low temperatures the spin glass order remains, as characterized by the Edwards-Anderson order parameter.[11]
  25. The ”quantum spin glass” is therefore neither ergodic, nor many-body localized.[11]
  26. In its simplest form, the emergent hierarchical order in spin glasses is mimicked by Derrida’s hierarchical models, which I will briefly review.[12]
  27. The main aim of this talk then concerns the fate of the spin glass phase under the addition of a constant perpendicular magnetic field.[12]
  28. The underlying principle of erasure of hierarchical spin glass order will be discussed.[12]
  29. In this talk I will discuss the possibility of many-body localization (MBL) in a model of quantum spin glass, namely, the quantum Sherrington-Kirkpatrick (SK) model.[13]
  30. Yet, the model captures the essential properties of the spin glass: its qualitative features directly apply to much more general models, including Sherrington-Kirkpatrick.[14]
  31. Solving spin glass models is a complex, often NP-hard, task.[15]
  32. A comparison with recent theoretical and experimental data in spin glass is made.[16]
  33. We describe the phase diagram of the system and discuss the realizability and detectability of the quantum spin glass and antiglass phases.[17]
  34. As a result, spin glass (6⇓⇓–9), charge glass (or charge-cluster glass) (10, 11), and superconducting vortex liquid/glass (12) all occur in the x-H-T phase diagram near the SIT.[18]
  35. The region is located within the thermodynamic spin glass phase.[19]
  36. These earlier works point to the necessity to examine a finite-connectivity quantum spin glass, in search of MBL.[19]
  37. In this section, we apply the previously described methods to the transverse-field Ising spin glass Hamiltonian (2.1).[19]
  38. Here, we immediately face an issue: the computation of the forward approximation is obstructed by the fact that the spin glass term has highly degenerate energy levels.[19]

소스