"충족 가능성 문제"의 두 판 사이의 차이

수학노트
둘러보기로 가기 검색하러 가기
(→‎노트: 새 문단)
 
(→‎메타데이터: 새 문단)
 
30번째 줄: 30번째 줄:
 
===소스===
 
===소스===
 
  <references />
 
  <references />
 +
 +
== 메타데이터 ==
 +
 +
===위키데이터===
 +
* ID :  [https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q875276 Q875276]
 +
===Spacy 패턴 목록===
 +
* [{'LOWER': 'boolean'}, {'LOWER': 'satisfiability'}, {'LEMMA': 'problem'}]
 +
* [{'LOWER': 'propositional'}, {'LOWER': 'satisfiability'}, {'LEMMA': 'problem'}]
 +
* [{'LEMMA': 'SATISFIABILITY'}]
 +
* [{'LEMMA': 'SAT'}]

2020년 12월 28일 (월) 08:20 기준 최신판

노트

말뭉치

  1. 3SAT asks whether it is possible to solve the Boolean satisfiability problem provided that there are at most 3 variables between each pair of parentheses in the Boolean formula.[1]
  2. Because 3-SAT is a restriction of SAT, it is not obvious that 3-SAT is difficult to solve.[2]
  3. But we already showed that SAT is in NP.[2]
  4. So our goal is to find a polynomial-time reduction from SAT to 3-SAT.[2]
  5. What if we restrict SAT even further, insisting that every clause have exactly 2 literals?[2]
  6. I would start from the question, what's SAT in general.[3]
  7. SAT is satisfiability problem - say you have Boolean expression written using only AND, OR, NOT, variables, and parentheses.[3]
  8. SAT3 problem is a special case of SAT problem, where Boolean expression should have very strict form.[3]
  9. I would advise to at look at application of SAT and 3SAT problem that close to your field of studying.[3]
  10. SAT is the first problem that was shown to be NP-Complete.[4]
  11. When we’re discussing the SAT problem, it’s essential to know about the conjunctive normal form (CNF).[4]
  12. We can prove by taking any language and reducing it to SAT in polynomial time.[4]
  13. Hence all NP-Hard problems can be reduced to CNF, which means, they can be reduced to an SAT problem.[4]
  14. This transform takes O(m+n) time if there were n clauses and m total literals in the SAT instance.[5]
  15. This means that all problems in the complexity class NP, which includes a wide range of natural decision and optimization problems, are at most as difficult to solve as SAT.[6]
  16. The Boolean satisfiability problem (SAT) is, given a formula, to check whether it is satisfiable.[6]
  17. There are several special cases of the Boolean satisfiability problem in which the formulas are required to have a particular structure.[6]
  18. For some versions of the SAT problem, it is useful to define the notion of a generalized conjunctive normal form formula, viz.[6]
  19. To show that this method is equally applicable to general SAT problems, we choose a 3-SAT predicate in this example and solve it using the idea of 2-SAT example.[7]
  20. In computer science, the Boolean satisfiability problem is the problem of determining if there exists an interpretation that satisfies a given Boolean formula.[8]
  21. , the techniques here can be applied to the more general case (k-SAT, discussed in the next section) for which Grover’s algorithm can outperform the best classical algorithm.[8]
  22. Maximum 3-Satisfiability (MAX-3SAT) is a counterpart of the Boolean satisfiability problem that can be treated as a constraint optimization problem.[9]
  23. 3-SAT is a special case of SAT which is the problem of determining whether all of a collection of clauses are true for some truth assignment to the variables contained in those clauses.[10]
  24. So, algorithms for solving SAT problems can also be used to solve 3-SAT problems.[10]
  25. Any non-Deterministic Polynomial problem can be solved in the polynomial time to the SAT, so an algorithm that can solve the SAT problem efficiently is sure to solve all NP problems.[10]
  26. Since the 1990s, the research hotspot of SAT problem has shifted to incomplete algorithm research.[10]

소스

메타데이터

위키데이터

Spacy 패턴 목록

  • [{'LOWER': 'boolean'}, {'LOWER': 'satisfiability'}, {'LEMMA': 'problem'}]
  • [{'LOWER': 'propositional'}, {'LOWER': 'satisfiability'}, {'LEMMA': 'problem'}]
  • [{'LEMMA': 'SATISFIABILITY'}]
  • [{'LEMMA': 'SAT'}]