페아노 공리계

수학노트
Pythagoras0 (토론 | 기여)님의 2021년 2월 25일 (목) 23:59 판 (→‎메타데이터: 새 문단)
(차이) ← 이전 판 | 최신판 (차이) | 다음 판 → (차이)
둘러보기로 가기 검색하러 가기

노트

말뭉치

  1. Peano axioms, also known as Peano’s postulates, in number theory, five axioms introduced in 1889 by Italian mathematician Giuseppe Peano.[1]
  2. In particular, the Peano axioms enable an infinite set to be generated by a finite set of symbols and rules.[1]
  3. The nine Peano axioms contain three types of statements.[2]
  4. The next four are general statements about equality; in modern treatments these are often not taken as part of the Peano axioms, but rather as axioms of the "underlying logic".[2]
  5. The Peano axioms define the arithmetical properties of natural numbers, usually represented as a set N or N .[2]
  6. Since they are logically valid in first-order logic with equality, they are not considered to be part of "the Peano axioms" in modern treatments.[2]
  7. “Peano axioms” can be found today in numerous textbooks in a form similar to our list in Section 9.2.[3]
  8. The axioms below for the natural numbers are called the Peano axioms.[4]
  9. But rst, do we know there is any set at all satisfying the Peano axioms?[4]
  10. For many reasons, mathematicians nd it convenient to assume the axioms of set theory, and it so happens that the Peano axioms follow from the set theory axioms as theorems.[4]
  11. Its obvious enough to me that they do, and they certainly satisfy the Peano axioms![4]
  12. The Peano axioms were proposed by Giuseppe Peano to derive the theory of arithmetic.[5]
  13. This characterization of N by Dedekind has become to be known as Dedekind/Peano axioms for the natural numbers.[6]
  14. Were 1 not in position to prove this from the Dedekind/Peano axioms yet, but after a number of denitions and theorems about addition, multiplication, and order, we could.[6]
  15. We can do that from the Dedekind/Peano axioms, but not yet, because we havent even got a denition for the ordering, m < n, on natural numbers.[6]
  16. The so-called Peano postulates for the natural numbers were introduced by Giuseppe Peano in 1889.[7]
  17. Thus the Peano postulates characterize N up to isomorphism.[7]
  18. However, when it comes to designing a formal theory in the predicate calculus based on these Peano postulates we cannot formulate GP3 except in the context of formal set theory.[7]
  19. An apparent paradox is that the Peano postulates GP1, GP2, GP3 characterize the natural numbers in set theory (as explained above), and yet there are nonstandard models for PA.[7]
  20. (This corresponds to the Peano axiom concerning not being in the image of the successor function.[8]
  21. While that Peano axiom ensures, that not only consists of one element, the transfinite equivalent here ensures, that is a proper class.[8]
  22. (This corresponds to the Peano axiom concerning the successor function to be injective.[8]
  23. I mentioned Peano axioms as the foundation on which these operations are defined and their properties established.[9]
  24. Associativity and commutativity of both addition and multiplication follow from the Peano axioms.[9]
  25. And in 1891 Giuseppe Peano gave essentially the Peano axioms listed here (they were also given slightly less formally by Richard Dedekind in 1888)—which have been used unchanged ever since.[10]
  26. The proof of Gödel's Theorem in 1931 (see page 1158) demonstrated the universality of the Peano axioms.[10]
  27. The Peano axioms for arithmetic seem sufficient to support most of the whole field of number theory.[10]
  28. Alright, let’s now examine the Peano axioms one by one.[11]
  29. Well, I hope by now you have gained a solid knowledge of what these Peano axioms are all about.[11]
  30. The so-called Peano axioms were first formulated by Richard Dedekind.[12]
  31. What we want to do here is to show how the arithmetic of the natural numbers can be derived from the Peano axioms.[13]
  32. The set N together with 0 and the successor function s : N → N satisfies the Peano axioms.[14]
  33. These postulates have been used more-or-less the same form ever since, and are known as the Peano axioms.[15]
  34. One of the 23 problems posed by David Hilbert in 1900 was to prove consistency of the Peano axioms.[15]
  35. The modern version of Peano axioms can be put as follows.[16]
  36. Our work will result in the so-called Peano axioms.[17]
  37. PEANO AXIOMS FOR NATURAL NUMBERS - AN INTRODUCTION TO PROOFS (4) Prove that intersection is an associative operation.[18]
  38. The system of axioms we use here is a famous system called the Dedekind- Peano axioms (Section 2), or the Peano axioms for short.[19]
  39. One of the most famous things he is known for is the five Peano axioms, which defined the natural numbers in terms of a set of elements.[20]
  40. This theory constitutes a fundamental formalism for arithmetic, and the Peano axioms form a basis for the formalisation of stronger theories, such as second-order arithmetic.[21]
  41. Using the Peano axioms, one can construct many of the most important number systems and structures of modern mathematics.[21]
  42. The natural number system (N, 0, S) can be shown to satisfy the Peano axioms.[21]
  43. The lambda calculus gives another construction of the natural numbers that satisfies the Peano axioms.[21]
  44. Similarly we have Peano axioms for strings: 1.[22]
  45. As in, how much could you prove by just taking some statement and reasoning about it by applying the Peano axioms?[23]

소스

메타데이터

위키데이터

Spacy 패턴 목록

  • [{'LOWER': 'peano'}, {'LEMMA': 'axiom'}]
  • [{'LOWER': 'dedekind'}, {'OP': '*'}, {'LOWER': 'peano'}, {'LEMMA': 'axiom'}]
  • [{'LOWER': 'peano'}, {'LEMMA': 'postulate'}]