"5항 관계식 (5-term relation)"의 두 판 사이의 차이

수학노트
둘러보기로 가기 검색하러 가기
122번째 줄: 122번째 줄:
 
*  Kashaev, R. M. 2004. “The q-binomial formula and the Rogers dilogarithm identity”. <em>math/0407078</em> (7월 6). http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0407078<br>
 
*  Kashaev, R. M. 2004. “The q-binomial formula and the Rogers dilogarithm identity”. <em>math/0407078</em> (7월 6). http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0407078<br>
 
* '''[GM1997]'''[http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009709927327 Algebraic Dilogarithm Identities] ,Basil Gordon  and Richard J. Mcintosh, 1997
 
* '''[GM1997]'''[http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009709927327 Algebraic Dilogarithm Identities] ,Basil Gordon  and Richard J. Mcintosh, 1997
* Functional equations of iterated integrals with regular singularities<br> Zdzisław Wojtkowiak<br> Source: Nagoya Math. J. Volume 142 (1996), 145-159.
+
* Zdzisław Wojtkowiak, Functional equations of iterated integrals with regular singularities, <em>Nagoya Math. J. Volume</em> 142 (1996), 145-159. http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.nmj/1118772047
 
* Moak, Daniel S. 1984. “The $q$-analogue of Stirling’s formula”. <em>The Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics</em> 14 (2): 403–413. doi:[http://dx.doi.org/10.1216/RMJ-1984-14-2-403 10.1216/RMJ-1984-14-2-403].
 
* Moak, Daniel S. 1984. “The $q$-analogue of Stirling’s formula”. <em>The Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics</em> 14 (2): 403–413. doi:[http://dx.doi.org/10.1216/RMJ-1984-14-2-403 10.1216/RMJ-1984-14-2-403].
  
128번째 줄: 128번째 줄:
 
* http://www.ams.org/mathscinet
 
* http://www.ams.org/mathscinet
 
* http://dx.doi.org/
 
* http://dx.doi.org/
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
<h5>관련도서</h5>
 
 
*  도서내검색<br>
 
** http://books.google.com/books?q=
 
** http://book.daum.net/search/contentSearch.do?query=
 
*  도서검색<br>
 
** http://books.google.com/books?q=
 
** http://book.daum.net/search/mainSearch.do?query=
 
** http://book.daum.net/search/mainSearch.do?query=
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
<h5>관련기사</h5>
 
 
*  네이버 뉴스 검색 (키워드 수정)<br>
 
** http://news.search.naver.com/search.naver?where=news&x=0&y=0&sm=tab_hty&query=
 
** http://news.search.naver.com/search.naver?where=news&x=0&y=0&sm=tab_hty&query=
 
** http://news.search.naver.com/search.naver?where=news&x=0&y=0&sm=tab_hty&query=
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
<h5>블로그</h5>
 
 
*  구글 블로그 검색<br>
 
** http://blogsearch.google.com/blogsearch?q=
 
* [http://navercast.naver.com/science/list 네이버 오늘의과학]
 
* [http://math.dongascience.com/ 수학동아]
 
* [http://www.ams.org/mathmoments/ Mathematical Moments from the AMS]
 
* [http://betterexplained.com/ BetterExplained]
 

2011년 11월 26일 (토) 03:37 판

이 항목의 스프링노트 원문주소

 

 

개요

 

 

 로저스 다이로그 함수
  • 로저스 다이로그 함수 (Roger's dilogarithm) 의 정의
    \(x\in (0,1)\)에서 로저스 dilogarithm을 다음과 같이 정의
    \(L(x)=\operatorname{Li}_2(x)+\frac{1}{2}\log x\log (1-x)=-\frac{1}{2}\int_{0}^{x}\frac{\log(1-y)}{y}+\frac{\log(1-y)}{1-y}dy\)

 

 

 5항 관계식
  • 로저스 다이로그 함수 \(L(x)\)에 대하여 다음이 성립한다
    \(0\leq x,y\leq 1\) 일 때,
    \(L(x)+L(1-xy)+L(y)+L(\frac{1-y}{1-xy})+L\Left( \frac{1-x}{1-xy} )\right)=\frac{\pi^2}{2}\)
  • \(1-x_{i}=x_{i-1}x_{i+1}\), \(x_0=x\), \(x_2=y\)로 정의되는 점화식은 주기가 5인 수열이 된다
    \(x_0=x, x_1=1-xy, x_2=y, x_3=\frac{1-y}{1-xy}, x_4=\frac{1-x}{1-xy}\)
  • 집합 \(\{0,1,\infty,y,xy\}\) 에서 4개의 원소를 뽑아 얻어지는 교차비(cross ratio)

 

 

 q-이항정리를 통한 증명
  • [GM1997]참고
  • q-이항정리
    \(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{(a;q)_n}{(q;q)_n}b^n=\frac{(ab;q)_{\infty}}{(b;q)_{\infty}}\)
  • z를 \((1-az)b=1-z\) 의 해로 정의, 즉
    \(z=\frac{1-b}{1-ab}\)
  • \(q=e^{-t}\)이고 t가 0으로 갈 때, 양변의 근사식은 다음과 같다
    좌변  \(\frac{\operatorname{Li}_2(az)-\operatorname{Li}_2(a)-\operatorname{Li}_2(z)+\operatorname{Li}_2(1)-\log z\log b}{t}\)
    우변 \(\frac{\operatorname{Li}_2(b)-\operatorname{Li}_2(ab)}{t}\)
  • 양변의 근사식을 비교하여 5항 관계식을 얻는다
    \(\operatorname{Li}_2(az)-\operatorname{Li}_2(a)-\operatorname{Li}_2(z)+\operatorname{Li}_2(1)-\log z\log b}=\operatorname{Li}_2(b)-\operatorname{Li}_2(ab)}\)

 

 

재미있는 사실

" I like explicit, hands-on formulas. To me they have a beauty of their own. They can be deep or not. As an example, imagine you have a series of numbers such that if you add 1 to any number you will get the product of its left and right neighbors. Then this series will repeat itself at every fifth step! For instance, if you start with 3, 4 then the sequence continues: 3, 4, 5/3, 2/3, 1, 3, 4, 5/3, etc. The difference between a mathematician and a nonmathematician is not just being able to discover something like this, but to care about it and to be curious about why it's true, what it means, and what other things in mathematics it might be connected with. In this particular case, the statement itself turns out to be connected with a myriad of deep topics in advanced mathematics: hyperbolic geometry, algebraic K-theory, the Schrodinger equation of quantum mechanics, and certain models of quantum field theory. I find this kind of connection between very elementary and very deep mathematics overwhelmingly beautiful." Don Zagier (Mathematicians: An Outer View of the Inner World):

http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/11650/what-is-the-connection-of-the-sequence-3-4-5-3-2-3-1-with-deep-topics

 

 

역사

 

 

 

메모

 

 

 

관련된 항목들

 

 

수학용어번역

 

 

사전 형태의 자료

 

 

관련논문

[1]