"Knot theory"의 두 판 사이의 차이

수학노트
둘러보기로 가기 검색하러 가기
60번째 줄: 60번째 줄:
  
 
*  Jones polynomial and <math>U_q[\mathfrak{sl}(2)]</math><br>
 
*  Jones polynomial and <math>U_q[\mathfrak{sl}(2)]</math><br>
* [[Knot theory|Knot Theory]] and Statistical Mechanics<br>
+
* [[Knot theory|Knot Theory]] and Statistical Mechanics[http://www.bkfc.net/altendor/KnotTheoryAndStatisticalMechanics.pdf ]<br>
** http://www.bkfc.net/altendor/KnotTheoryAndStatisticalMechanics.pdf
 
 
** http://web.phys.ntu.edu.tw/phystalks/Wu.pdf
 
** http://web.phys.ntu.edu.tw/phystalks/Wu.pdf
  
100번째 줄: 99번째 줄:
 
 
 
 
  
<h5>encyclopedia</h5>
+
<h5>encyclopedia[http://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%EB%A7%A4%EB%93%AD%EC%9D%B4%EB%A1%A0 ]</h5>
  
* [http://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%EB%A7%A4%EB%93%AD%EC%9D%B4%EB%A1%A0 http://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/매듭이론]
 
 
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/knot_theory
 
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/knot_theory
 
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_knot_theory_topics
 
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_knot_theory_topics
140번째 줄: 138번째 줄:
 
<h5>articles</h5>
 
<h5>articles</h5>
  
* The Jones Polynomial<br>
+
* [http://math.berkeley.edu/%7Evfr/jones.pdf The Jones Polynomial]<br>
** V.Jones, 2005-
+
** V.Jones, 2005-8
 +
* http://www.bkfc.net/altendor/KnotTheoryAndStatisticalMechanics.pdf
 
* [http://siba2.unile.it/ese/issues/1/19/Notematv9supplp17.pdf Knot and physics]<br>
 
* [http://siba2.unile.it/ese/issues/1/19/Notematv9supplp17.pdf Knot and physics]<br>
 
**  Kauffman, 1989<br>
 
**  Kauffman, 1989<br>

2010년 1월 29일 (금) 17:45 판

introduction
  • ambient isotopy defines an equivalence class of knots
  • three Reidemeister moves

 

 

examples
  • trivial knot
  • Hopf link
  • figure 8 knot
  • trefoil knot

 

 

knot diagram
  • projection to two dimensional space

 

 

Kauffman's principle

 

 

knot invariants
  • Alexander-Conway polynomial
  • Jones polynomial
  • Vassiliev invariants
  • define them recursively using the skein relation
  • Reidemeister's theorem is used to prove that they are knot invariants
  • The puzzle on the mathematical side was that these objects are invariants of a three dimensional situation, but one did not have an intrinsically three dimensional definition.
  • There were many elegant definitions of the knot polynomials, but they all involved looking in some way at a two dimensional projection or slicing of the knot, giving a two dimensional algorithm for computation, and proving that the result is independent of the chosen projection.
  • This is analogous to studying a physical theory that is in fact relativistic but in which one does not know of a manifestly relativistic formulation - like quantum electrodynamics in the 1930's.

 

 

Jones polynomial

 

 

Knot theory, statistical mechanics and quantum groups
  • using the Boltzmann weights from the various exactly solvable models, we can discover an infinite series of invariants of knots
  • so the problem is to find a nice set of Boltzmann weights which give non-trivial invariants

 

 

history

 

 

related items

 

 

books

 

 

encyclopedia[2]

 

 

question and answers(Math Overflow)

 

 

blogs

 

 

articles

 

 

experts on the field

 

 

TeX