"함수"의 두 판 사이의 차이

수학노트
둘러보기로 가기 검색하러 가기
1번째 줄: 1번째 줄:
<h5>간단한 요약</h5>
+
<h5 style="margin: 0px; line-height: 3.428em; color: rgb(34, 61, 103); font-family: 'malgun gothic',dotum,gulim,sans-serif; font-size: 1.166em; background-position: 0px 100%;">이 항목의 수학노트 원문주소</h5>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<h5>개요</h5>
  
 
* 함수와 관련된 기본적인 개념과 수학에서 가장 기본적인 함수 몇가지를 배움.
 
* 함수와 관련된 기본적인 개념과 수학에서 가장 기본적인 함수 몇가지를 배움.
*  
+
 
 +
 
  
 
 
 
 
30번째 줄: 37번째 줄:
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
<h5>재미있는 문제</h5>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
<h5>관련된 개념 및 나중에 더 배우게 되는 것들</h5>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
<h5>관련있는 다른 과목</h5>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
<h5>관련된 대학교 수학</h5>
 
  
 
 
 
 
59번째 줄: 44번째 줄:
 
<h5>메모</h5>
 
<h5>메모</h5>
  
Early attempts to define a function were made by James Gregory (1687), Euler<br> (1748), and, later in the 18th century, by La Croix, Lagrange, and d'Alembert. All<br> these attempts were intuitive, rough-and-readayf fairsa nd none gained acceptance.<br> Fourier and Cauchy, both around 1820, offered improved versions; finally Dirichlet in<br> 1837 identifiedt he essentialp ropertyo f uniqueness": y is a functiono f x whent o each<br> valueo f x in a given intervalt herec orrespondas uniquev alueo f y" [5, p. 950].<br> This is not quite the end of the story,o f course;i n time it became apparentt.
+
Early attempts to define a function were made by James Gregory (1687), Euler (1748), and, later in the 18th century, by La Croix, Lagrange, and d'Alembert. All<br> these attempts were intuitive, rough-and-readayf fairsa nd none gained acceptance.<br> Fourier and Cauchy, both around 1820, offered improved versions; finally Dirichlet in 1837 identifiedt he essentialp ropertyo f uniqueness": y is a functiono f x when to each<br> valueo f x in a given intervalt herec orrespondas unique value of y" [5, p. 950].<br> This is not quite the end of the story,o f course;i n time it became apparentt.
  
 
* '''[Atkinson2002]'''
 
* '''[Atkinson2002]'''
69번째 줄: 54번째 줄:
 
<h5>관련논문</h5>
 
<h5>관련논문</h5>
  
* '''[Atkinson2002]'''[http://www.jstor.org/stable/1558992 Where Do Functions Come from?]<br>
+
* '''[Atkinson2002]'''[http://www.jstor.org/stable/1558992 Where Do Functions Come from?] Leigh Atkinson, <cite>The College Mathematics Journal</cite>, Vol. 33, No. 2 (Mar., 2002), pp. 107-112
** Leigh Atkinson, <cite>The College Mathematics Journal</cite>, Vol. 33, No. 2 (Mar., 2002), pp. 107-112
 
  
* [http://www.jstor.org/stable/2686848 Evolution of the Function Concept: A Brief Survey]<br>
+
* [http://www.jstor.org/stable/2686848 Evolution of the Function Concept: A Brief Survey] Israel Kleiner, <cite>The College Mathematics Journal</cite>, Vol. 20, No. 4 (Sep., 1989), pp. 282-300
** Israel Kleiner, <cite>The College Mathematics Journal</cite>, Vol. 20, No. 4 (Sep., 1989), pp. 282-300
 
  
* [http://www.jstor.org/stable/3604739 An Introduction to Logarithms]<br>
+
* [http://www.jstor.org/stable/3604739 An Introduction to Logarithms] F. G. Brown, <cite>The Mathematical Gazette</cite>, Vol. 11, No. 160 (Oct., 1922), pp. 164-166
** F. G. Brown, <cite>The Mathematical Gazette</cite>, Vol. 11, No. 160 (Oct., 1922), pp. 164-166
 
  
* [http://www.jstor.org/stable/3026878 A Brief History of Logarithms]<br>
+
* [http://www.jstor.org/stable/3026878 A Brief History of Logarithms] R. C. Pierce, Jr., <cite>The Two-Year College Mathematics Journal</cite>, Vol. 8, No. 1 (Jan., 1977), pp. 22-26
** R. C. Pierce, Jr., <cite>The Two-Year College Mathematics Journal</cite>, Vol. 8, No. 1 (Jan., 1977), pp. 22-26
+
* [http://www.jstor.org/stable/2973509 History of the Exponential and Logarithmic Concepts] Florian Cajori, <cite>The American Mathematical Monthly</cite>, Vol. 20, No. 1 (Jan., 1913), pp. 5-14
* [http://www.jstor.org/stable/2973509 History of the Exponential and Logarithmic Concepts]<br>
 
** Florian Cajori, <cite>The American Mathematical Monthly</cite>, Vol. 20, No. 1 (Jan., 1913), pp. 5-14
 
  
 
 
 
 

2011년 11월 6일 (일) 09:46 판

이 항목의 수학노트 원문주소

 

 

개요
  • 함수와 관련된 기본적인 개념과 수학에서 가장 기본적인 함수 몇가지를 배움.

 

 

배우기 전에 알고 있어야 하는 것들

 

 

중요한 개념 및 정리

 

 

중요한 함수의 예

 

 

 

메모

Early attempts to define a function were made by James Gregory (1687), Euler (1748), and, later in the 18th century, by La Croix, Lagrange, and d'Alembert. All
these attempts were intuitive, rough-and-readayf fairsa nd none gained acceptance.
Fourier and Cauchy, both around 1820, offered improved versions; finally Dirichlet in 1837 identifiedt he essentialp ropertyo f uniqueness": y is a functiono f x when to each
valueo f x in a given intervalt herec orrespondas unique value of y" [5, p. 950].
This is not quite the end of the story,o f course;i n time it became apparentt.

  • [Atkinson2002]

 

 

관련논문

 

관련기사