Quantum decoherence

수학노트
둘러보기로 가기 검색하러 가기

노트

말뭉치

  1. However, a major hurtle remains that will require immense efforts to overcome: decoherence.[1]
  2. Quantum scientists have their work cut out for them in wrangling all of these potential sources of decoherence.[1]
  3. Let’s be clear: decoherence is still a problem for quantum sensing.[1]
  4. Quantum computing experts are finding ways suppress decoherence, and they’re making big improvements every year.[1]
  5. Thus we clarify that decoherence is not a new theory unto itself, but is instead an efficient and fruitful repackaging of theory.[2]
  6. If it is not perfectly isolated, for example during a measurement, coherence is shared with the environment and appears to be lost with time; a process called quantum decoherence.[3]
  7. Decoherence does not generate actual wave-function collapse.[3]
  8. Specifically, decoherence does not attempt to explain the measurement problem.[3]
  9. Rather, decoherence provides an explanation for the transition of the system to a mixture of states that seem to correspond to those states observers perceive.[3]
  10. The decoherence (which accounts for the disappearance) of macroscopic quantum effects is shown experimentally to be correlated with the loss of isolation.[4]
  11. " Decoherence theorists say that they add no new elements to quantum mechanics (such as "hidden variables") but they do deny one of the three basic assumptions - namely Dirac's projection postulate.[4]
  12. Nonlocality and quantum entanglement (which is used to "derive" decoherence).[4]
  13. Decoherence advocates therefore look to other attempts to formulate quantum mechanics.[4]
  14. Observationally, the decoherence effect predicted by the event formalism will be the sum of these two effects.[5]
  15. An experimental study of this weaker decoherence effect with sufficient statistical confidence requires a significant number of satellite passes.[5]
  16. OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ T. C. Ralph , J. Pienaar , Entanglement decoherence in a gravitational well according to the event formalism .[5]
  17. The modern foundation of decoherence as a subject in its own right was laid by H.-D. Zeh in the early 1970s (Zeh 1970, 1973).[6]
  18. In fact, the term decoherence refers to two largely overlapping areas of research.[6]
  19. The second (the theory of ‘decoherent histories’ or ‘consistent histories’) is an abstract and more general formalism capturing essential features of decoherence.[6]
  20. Finally, in Section 4 we describe the overall picture of the emergent structures that result from this use of decoherence, as well as a few more speculative applications.[6]
  21. The term decoherence is used in many fields of (quantum) physics to describe the disappearance or absence of certain superpositions of quantum states.[7]
  22. Equivalently, decoherence describes irreversibly increasing entanglement as a consequence of a unitary global dynamics.[7]
  23. From this perspective, some types of the decoherence processes can be more easily corrected, without any external dynamical operations with the environment, comparing to others, more destructive ones.[8]
  24. It opens the broad possibility of further investigations, various extensions and refining of operational understanding what the decoherence actually is about.[8]
  25. Consequently, for small k’s the trace left by the exciton in the bath is too weak to be distinguished from the vacuum case and, thus, decoherence is only partial4.[8]
  26. The decoherence was determined through a contrast loss at different beam path separations, surface distances and conductibilities.[9]
  27. The results will enable the determination and minimization of specific decoherence channels in the design of novel quantum instruments.[9]
  28. The decoherence was measured in dependence of the path separation and the electron beam distance to the surface.[9]
  29. In a separate experiment a gold plate was introduced as the decoherence surface (also at room temperature).[9]
  30. This paper gives an overview of the theory and experimental observation of the decoherence mechanism.[10]
  31. We introduce the essential concepts and the mathematical formalism of decoherence, focusing on the picture of the decoherence process as a continuous monitoring of a quantum system by its environment.[10]
  32. We review several classes of decoherence models and discuss the description of the decoherence dynamics in terms of master equations.[10]
  33. We survey methods for avoiding and mitigating decoherence and give an overview of several experiments that have studied decoherence processes.[10]
  34. In other words, the very act of measurement induces quantum decoherence due to the inevitable introduction of environmental noise by the measurement process.[11]
  35. Alternative error correction schemes are therefore necessary if we are to overcome the decoherence problem.[11]
  36. We suggest an approach for suppressing errors by employing preprocessing and postprocessing unitary operations, which precede and follow the action of a decoherence channel.[12]
  37. We consider the case of decoherence channels acting on a single qubit belonging to a many-qubit state.[12]
  38. We then consider the realization of our approach for the basic decoherence models, which include single-qubit depolarizing, dephasing, and amplitude damping channels.[12]
  39. We also demonstrate that the decoherence robustness of multiqubit states for these decoherence models is determined by the entropy of the reduced state of the qubit undergoing the decoherence channel.[12]
  40. In this paper we set up a method called overlap decoherence correction (ODC) to take into account the quantum decoherence effect in a surface hopping framework.[13]
  41. We address the issue of quantum decoherence in mixed quantum‐classical simulations.[14]
  42. Quantum decoherence effects appear at a rate consistent with previous estimates.[15]
  43. However, recent experiments have managed to delay decoherence by decoupling quantum particles from their environment.[16]
  44. If decoherence is delayed then the superposition states become evident.[16]
  45. The reason we never see Schr�dinger's cat both dead and alive at the same time is because decoherence takes place within the box long before we open it.[16]
  46. As was explained in the main text, there is now experimental support for this decoherence viewpoint.[16]
  47. The decoherence theory is reverting a quantum system back to classical through interactions with the environment which decay and eliminate quantum behaviour of particles.[17]
  48. Due to decoherence qubits are extremely fragile and their ability to stay in superposition and or entangle is severely jeopardized.[17]
  49. Radiation, light, sound, vibrations, heat, magnetic fields or even the act of measuring a qubit are all examples of decoherence.[17]
  50. Which basically means if we don’t factor in the precautions for completely eliminating decoherence then there is no quantum system aka Quantum Computer.[17]
  51. The results indicate that the strong two-body imperfections suppress the internal decoherence and enhance the performance of the CNOT gate.[18]
  52. Moreover, the largest source of error is found to be unitary due to coherent shifting rather than decoherence.[18]
  53. Our theoretical results indicate that real-time detection of ion-channel operation at millisecond resolution is possible by directly monitoring the quantum decoherence of the NV probe.[19]
  54. In this context, decoherence refers to the loss of quantum coherence between magnetic sublevels of the NV atomic system due to interactions with an environment.[19]
  55. We find that, over and above these background sources, the decoherence of the NV spin levels is highly sensitive to the ion flux through a single ion channel.[19]
  56. This decoherence results in a decrease in fluorescence, which is most pronounced in regions close to the ion-channel opening.[19]
  57. This, of course, is precisely the question that decoherence theory is designed to answer.[20]
  58. For the rest, we should now return to the previous taxonomy of strategies for solving, or dissolving, the problem, and see how they fare in the light of decoherence.[20]
  59. At first sight, both strategies are made straightforward by decoherence.[20]
  60. Unfortunately, things are not so simple, for a straightforward reason: decoherence is not a precisely defined process.[20]

소스

메타데이터

위키데이터

Spacy 패턴 목록

  • [{'LOWER': 'quantum'}, {'LEMMA': 'decoherence'}]
  • [{'LEMMA': 'decoherence'}]